Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 May;31(3):203-10.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/31.3.203.

Evaluation of a nurse-led falls prevention programme versus usual care: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Evaluation of a nurse-led falls prevention programme versus usual care: a randomized controlled trial

Elizabeth Lightbody et al. Age Ageing. 2002 May.

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate a nurse-led management plan and care pathway for older people discharged from an Accident and Emergency Department after a fall.

Design: randomized controlled trial.

Setting: a large teaching hospital.

Subjects: 348 consecutive patients aged 65 or over attending the Accident and Emergency Department with a fall.

Interventions: we randomized patients to falls nurse intervention or usual care. Within 4 weeks, the intervention group received a home assessment to address easily modifiable risk factors for falls. This included assessments of medication, ECG, blood pressure, cognition, visual acuity, hearing, vestibular dysfunction, balance, mobility, feet and footwear. All patients were given advice and education about general safety in the home.

Main outcome measures: Further falls, functional ability, re-attendance at the Accident and Emergency Department and admission to hospital.

Results: at 6 months post-Index fall, 36 patients in the intervention group and 39 patients in the control group had had 89 and 145 falls respectively. Although the intervention group had less falls, this was not significant (P>0.05). Similarly, the intervention group had fewer fall-related admissions and bed days (8 and 69 respectively) than the control group (10 and 233 respectively). The intervention group scored significantly higher in indicators of function (P<0.05) and mobility within the community (P<0.02).

Conclusions: although the differences were not significant, patients in the intervention group had fewer falls, less hospital attendances and spent less time in hospital. Moreover, patients in the intervention group were more functionally independent at 6 months post-Index fall.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types