Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Jun;56(6):424-9.
doi: 10.1136/jech.56.6.424.

Lung cancer: district active treatment rates affect survival

Affiliations

Lung cancer: district active treatment rates affect survival

M L Cartman et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Jun.

Abstract

Study objective: This study investigates variation in management and treatment of lung cancer patients and determines the impact of any variation in treatment on survival.

Design: A retrospective study of population based data held by the Northern & Yorkshire Cancer Registry and Information Service (NYCRIS), comparing active treatment rates for lung cancer with survival by districts. SETTING The then 17 districts in Yorkshire and South Humber, England.

Patients: 22 654 patients registered with lung cancer between 1986 and 1994 and followed up until end of 1996.

Results: The overall rates of active treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) varied between districts from 37% to 56%. One year survival (with 95% CI) was significantly better in the districts with highest rates of active treatment 23% (22% to 24%) compared with 19% (17% to 20%) for those with lowest treatment rates. Non-small cell lung cancer patients (55%) in the districts with highest active treatment rates had an age adjusted relative risk of death during the follow up period, relative to risk of death in the districts with the lower treatment rates of 0.88 (0.83 to 0.92). Clinically diagnosed patients (34%) had an age adjusted RR of 0.92 (0.86 to 0.96). RR in small cell cancer (11%) was not significant.

Conclusion: This study has shown wide variations in the rates of active treatment for lung cancer patients within districts across one large region of England. Active treatment was strongly associated with improved survival, especially in non-small cell lung cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer. 1999 Nov 1;86(9):1867-76 - PubMed
    1. Curr Probl Cancer. 1999 Mar-Apr;23(2):59-98 - PubMed
    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Apr 1;47(1):149-55 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2000 Feb 5;355(9202):479-85 - PubMed
    1. Chest. 2000 Jul;118(1):129-37 - PubMed

MeSH terms