Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 May;186(5 Suppl Nature):S127-30.
doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.121812.

Paracervical block for labor analgesia: a brief historic review

Affiliations
Review

Paracervical block for labor analgesia: a brief historic review

Mark A Rosen. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May.

Abstract

This historic review was written to clarify the known efficacy and side effects of paracervical blockade for labor analgesia. Although the popularity of the technique has diminished considerably, it continues to be used by some clinicians with ostensibly good results. The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR;SR-PREG) and the electronic database MEDLINE were searched for studies reported in English to determine efficacy and side effects of paracervical block. Four randomized controlled studies specifically addressed paracervical block efficacy as assessed by parturients during labor with results of excellent or good analgesia among approximately 75%. Postparacervical block fetal bradycardia is the most significant side effect with a reported incidence ranging from 0% to approximately 40%. Overall, it appears that the incidence of postparacervical block fetal bradycardia is approximately 15%. However, the etiology of the observed fetal bradycardia remains unclear, and the incidence of adverse impact on fetal or neonatal outcome remains uncertain because there are too few trials with too few patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources