Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Apr;109(4):395-401.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.00141.x.

Objective assessment of bladder neck elevation and urethral compression at colposuspension

Affiliations

Objective assessment of bladder neck elevation and urethral compression at colposuspension

L Bombieri et al. BJOG. 2002 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: 1. To assess whether magnetic resonance imaging and intra-operative measurements are useful in assessing bladder neck elevation and urethral compression at colposuspension; 2. to see if intra-operative measurements could be a substitute for magnetic resonance scan measurements.

Design: Prospective, observational study.

Setting: Urogynaecology Unit, NHS Trust hospital.

Population: Seventy-seven women undergoing colposuspension.

Methods: Bladder neck elevation was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging and measuring the amount of suture bow-stringing intra-operatively. Urethral compression was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging and by two intra-operative measurements: the distance between the medial sutures (with a ruler) and the distance between the urethra and the pubic bone (using paired Hegar dilators).

Results: The assessment of bladder neck elevation and compression against the pubic bone using magnetic resonance imaging was reliable (95% limits of agreement: -7.1mm to +7.1mm and -1.7mm to +3.8mm, correlation coefficient 0.92 and 0.87, respectively). The intra-operative assessment of urethral compression with a ruler was also reproducible at both paravaginal and pectineal sites (95% limits of agreement -2.6mm to +2mm and -2.1mm to +2.4mm, respectively; correlation coefficient 0.99 for both distances). Other intra-operative measurements of bladder neck elevation (suture bow-stringing) and urethral compression (Hegars) did not correlate with equivalent magnetic resonance scan measurements (kappa =-0.046, P = 0.31; kappa = 0.052, P = 0.41, respectively).

Conclusions: Measurements have been found that can reliably assess bladder neck elevation and urethral compression at colposuspension. These measurements should be suitable for investigating morbidity following colposuspension.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources