Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Oct 1;367(Pt 1):263-9.
doi: 10.1042/BJ20020485.

Origins of the difference in Ca2+ requirement for activation of mu- and m-calpain

Affiliations

Origins of the difference in Ca2+ requirement for activation of mu- and m-calpain

Previn Dutt et al. Biochem J. .

Abstract

The mu- and m-calpains are closely related Ca(2+)-dependent cysteine proteases having different in vitro Ca(2+) requirements ( K (d)), of approx. 25 and 325 microM respectively. The two isoforms are heterodimers of slightly different large (80 kDa) subunits and an identical small (28 kDa) subunit, so that the difference in K (d) values must reside in the large subunits. As assayed here, these K (d) values relate to the Ca(2+) required for the first phase of calpain activation and do not reflect the lower Ca(2+) then required by fully activated calpain. On the basis of sequence comparison and the X-ray structure of m-calpain, many m-type residues in the C-terminal EF-hand-containing domain IV were converted into the corresponding mu-type residues, but these mutations did not produce the expected decrease in K (d). In a series of hybrid (mu/m) large-subunit calpains, the K (d) values decreased progressively towards that of mu-calpain as the proportion of mu-type sequence increased from 0 to 90%. K (d) values cannot therefore be ascribed to one or a few specific intramolecular interactions, but reflect the global response of the whole molecule to Ca(2+) binding. Nonetheless, 25% of the difference in K (d) values between mu- and m-calpain can be ascribed to the N-terminal peptide of the large subunit, whereas the C-terminal EF-hand-containing domain IV accounts for 65% of the difference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Biochem J. 2000 May 15;348 Pt 1:37-43 - PubMed
    1. J Biol Chem. 1997 Oct 10;272(41):25802-8 - PubMed
    1. Methods Mol Biol. 2000;144:109-16 - PubMed
    1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001 Feb 9;280(5):1333-9 - PubMed
    1. Protein Sci. 2001 Feb;10(2):301-12 - PubMed

Publication types