Lack of microbiological concordance between bone and non-bone specimens in chronic osteomyelitis: an observational study
- PMID: 12015818
- PMCID: PMC115844
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-2-8
Lack of microbiological concordance between bone and non-bone specimens in chronic osteomyelitis: an observational study
Abstract
Background: Prognosis of chronic osteomyelitis depends heavily on proper identification and treatment of the bone-infecting organism. Current knowledge on selecting the best specimen for culture is confusing, and many consider that non-bone specimens are suitable to replace bone cultures. This paper compares the microbiology of non-bone specimens with bone cultures, taking the last as the diagnostic gold standard.
Methods: Retrospective observational analysis of 50 patients with bacterial chronic osteomyelitis in a 750-bed University-based hospital.
Results: Concordance between both specimens for all etiologic agents was 28%, for Staphylococcus aureus 38%, and for organisms other than S. aureus 19%. The culture of non-bone specimens to identify the causative organisms in chronic osteomyelitis produced 52% false negatives and 36% false positives when compared against bone cultures.
Conclusions: Diagnosis and therapy of chronic osteomyelitis cannot be guided by cultures of non-bone specimens because their microbiology is substantially different to the microbiology of the bone.
Figures
References
-
- Mader JT, Calhoun J. Osteomyelitis. In: Mandell GL, Bennet JE, Dolin R, editor. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. Philadelphia, Churchill Livingston; 2000. pp. 1182–1196.
-
- Waldvogel FA, Vasey H. Osteomyelitis: the past decade. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:360–370. - PubMed
-
- Norden CW. Acute and chronic osteomyelitis. In: Armstrong D, Cohem J, editor. Infectious Diseases. London, Mosby; 1999. pp. 43.1–43.10.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources