Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 May 18;324(7347):1190.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1190.

Impaired glucose tolerance: qualitative and quantitative study of general practitioners' knowledge and perceptions

Affiliations

Impaired glucose tolerance: qualitative and quantitative study of general practitioners' knowledge and perceptions

Graeme Wylie et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate general practitioners' knowledge of and attitudes to impaired glucose tolerance.

Design: Mixed methodology qualitative and quantitative study with semistructured interviews, focus groups, and questionnaires.

Setting: 34 general practitioners in five primary care groups in the north east of England.

Results: All the general practitioners had knowledge of impaired glucose tolerance as a clinical entity, but they had little awareness of the clinical significance of impaired glucose tolerance and were uncertain about managing and following up these patients. Attitudes to screening were mixed and were associated with reservations about increased workload, concern about lack of resources, and pessimism about the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions. Some general practitioners felt strongly that screening patients for impaired glucose tolerance and subsequent lifestyle intervention medicalised an essentially social problem and that a health educational approach, involving schools and the media, should be adopted instead. A minority expressed a positive attitude towards a pharmacological approach.

Conclusion: Awareness of impaired glucose tolerance needs to be raised, and guidelines for management are needed. General practitioners remain to be convinced that they have a role in attempting to reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes by targeting interventions at patients with impaired glucose tolerance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
General practitioners' estimation of the number of patients known to have impaired glucose tolerance in their practice

Comment in

References

    1. Amos AF, McCarty DJ, Zimmet P. The rising global burden of diabetes and its complications: estimates and projections to the year 2010. Diabet Med. 1997;14:S1–85. - PubMed
    1. Dixon S, Currie CJ, Peters JR. The cost of diabetes: time for a different approach? Diabet Med. 2000;17:820–822. - PubMed
    1. Pierce M, Agarwal G, Ridout D. A survey of diabetes care in general practice in England and Wales. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50:542–545. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khunti K, Ganguli S. Who looks after people with diabetes: primary or secondary care? J Roy Soc Med. 2000;93:183–186. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alberti KG. Impaired glucose tolerance: what are the clinical implications? Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1998;40(suppl):S3–S8. - PubMed

Publication types