Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2002 Apr;8(2):59-60.
doi: 10.1054/jcaf.2002.32944.

Comment--the REMATCH trial: Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure

Affiliations
Comment

Comment--the REMATCH trial: Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure

Sharon A Hunt. J Card Fail. 2002 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been used primarily as bridges to cardiac transplantation, although some patients have been maintained long term on these devices and a few have recovered enough to be weaned. This trial was designed to evaluate their suitability as long-term myocardial replacement therapy in patients who are ineligible for cardiac transplantation.

Methods and results: One hundred twenty-nine patients with end-stage heart failure who were ineligible for cardiac transplantation were randomly assigned to receive an LVAD (Thoratec HeartMate; Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA) or optimal medical therapy, with a primary end point of all-cause mortality. To be eligible, patients had to have New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV heart failure for at least 90 days despite attempted therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, diuretics, and digoxin; an ejection fraction </=25%; and an exercise peak O(2) uptake </=12 mL. kg(-1). min(-1) (later increased to 14 mL. kg(-1). min(-1)). Patient eligibility was approved by a gatekeeper at the coordinating center.

Results: Survival was significantly improved from 25% at 1 year in the medical therapy group to 52% in the LVAD group (relative risk, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.78; P = 0.001). However, at 2 years only 23% in the LVAD group were alive (compared with 8% in the medical group). Fifty of 54 deaths in the medical group were caused by left ventricular dysfunction; in the LVAD group, of the 41 total deaths, 17 were caused by sepsis, 7 by LVAD failure, 4 by cerebrovascular disease, 2 by pulmonary embolus, and only 1 by left ventricular dysfunction. Serious adverse events were 2.35 times as frequent in the LVAD group, predominately caused by infection, bleeding, neurologic dysfunction, and device malfunction. NYHA class improved in all LVAD survivors at 1 year. Quality of life was significantly improved more compared with the medical therapy group by some indices, but not by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire.

Conclusions: The use of an LVAD resulted in improved survival and quality of life in patients with extremely severe heart failure (75% 1-year mortality in the medical control group). However, only 23% of LVAD patients survived to 2 years and complications were frequent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

  • Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure.
    Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, Heitjan DF, Stevenson LW, Dembitsky W, Long JW, Ascheim DD, Tierney AR, Levitan RG, Watson JT, Meier P, Ronan NS, Shapiro PA, Lazar RM, Miller LW, Gupta L, Frazier OH, Desvigne-Nickens P, Oz MC, Poirier VL; Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) Study Group. Rose EA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 15;345(20):1435-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012175. N Engl J Med. 2001. PMID: 11794191 Clinical Trial.

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources