Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002 May:189:113-8.
doi: 10.1177/00034894021110s523.

Talker discrimination by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: preliminary results

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Talker discrimination by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: preliminary results

Miranda Cleary et al. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2002 May.

Abstract

Forty-four school-age children who had used a multichannel cochlear implant (CI) for at least 4 years were tested to assess their ability to discriminate differences between recorded pairs of female voices uttering sentences. Children were asked to respond "same voice" or "different voice" on each trial. Two conditions were examined. In one condition, the linguistic content of the sentence was always held constant and only the talker's voice varied from trial to trial. In another condition, the linguistic content of the utterance also varied so that to correctly respond "same voice," the child needed to recognize that two different sentences were spoken by the same talker. Data from normal-hearing children were used to establish that these tasks were well within the capabilities of children without hearing impairment. For the children with CIs, in the "fixed sentence condition" the mean proportion correct was 68%, which, although significantly different from the 50% score expected by chance, suggests that the children with CIs found this discrimination task rather difficult. In the "varied sentence condition," however, the mean proportion correct was only 57%, indicating that the children were essentially unable to recognize an unfamiliar talker's voice when the linguistic content of the paired sentences differed. Correlations with other speech and language outcome measures are also reported.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Distribution of talker discrimination scores A) in fixed and varied sentence conditions for 44 pediatric cochlear implant (CI) users and B) in varied sentence condition for group of 21 normal-hearing (NH) 5-year-olds.

References

    1. Kramer E. Judgement of personal characteristics and emotions from nonverbal properties of speech. Psychol Bull. 1963;60:408–20. - PubMed
    1. Kreiman J. Listening to voices: theory and practice in voice perception research. In: Johnson K, Mullennix JW, editors. Talker variability in speech processing. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press; 1997. pp. 85–108.
    1. Ptacek P, Sanders E. Age recognition from voice. J Speech Hear Res. 1966;9:273–7. - PubMed
    1. Pisoni DB. Some thoughts on “normalization” in speech perception. In: Johnson K, Mullennix JW, editors. Talker variability in speech processing. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press; 1997. pp. 9–32.
    1. Sommers MS, Kirk KI, Pisoni DB. Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format. Ear Hear. 1997;18:89–99. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources