Lead-time in prostate cancer screening (Finland)
- PMID: 12020110
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1015040231402
Lead-time in prostate cancer screening (Finland)
Abstract
Objective: Lead-time in prostate cancer screening was estimated using data from the Finnish randomized, population-based trial.
Methods: Lead-time was defined as the duration of follow-up needed to accrue the same expected number of incident prostate cancer cases in the absence of screening as detected in the initial screening round. Expected numbers were calculated using an age-cohort model.
Results: Based on findings among 10,000 men screened in 1996-1997 with 292 screen-detected cancers, lead-time was estimated as approximately 5-7 years, depending on the reference rates used. This corresponds to a mean duration of the detectable preclinical phase (DPCP) of 10-14 years, given that the cancers were detected on average at the midpoint of the DPCP.
Conclusions: The findings suggest that a screening interval substantially longer than the 2 years generally used for mammography screening is unlikely to cause a substantial loss of sensitivity. A long screening interval is further justified in order to diminish the extent of overdiagnosis, until mortality effects can be evaluated.
Similar articles
-
Test sensitivity in the European prostate cancer screening trial: results from Finland, Sweden, and the Netherlands.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jul;18(7):2000-5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0146. Epub 2009 Jun 30. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009. PMID: 19567505 Clinical Trial.
-
Family history and prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen.J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jun 1;20(11):2658-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.05.006. J Clin Oncol. 2002. PMID: 12039927 Clinical Trial.
-
Prognostic factors of prostate cancer mortality in a Finnish randomized screening trial.Int J Urol. 2018 Mar;25(3):270-276. doi: 10.1111/iju.13508. Epub 2017 Dec 10. Int J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29224236 Clinical Trial.
-
Detection of prostate cancer: the impact of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).Can J Urol. 2005 Feb;12 Suppl 1:2-6; discussion 92-3. Can J Urol. 2005. PMID: 15780157 Review.
-
Screening for prostate cancer.Urol Res. 1997;25 Suppl 2:S53-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00941988. Urol Res. 1997. PMID: 9144887 Review.
Cited by
-
A note on the catch-up time method for estimating lead or sojourn time in prostate cancer screening.Stat Med. 2013 Aug 30;32(19):3332-41. doi: 10.1002/sim.5750. Epub 2013 Jan 31. Stat Med. 2013. PMID: 23364954 Free PMC article.
-
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer.Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1046-55. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.062. Epub 2014 Jan 9. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 24439788 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mean sojourn time, overdiagnosis, and reduction in advanced stage prostate cancer due to screening with PSA: implications of sojourn time on screening.Br J Cancer. 2009 Apr 7;100(7):1198-204. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604973. Epub 2009 Mar 17. Br J Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19293796 Free PMC article.
-
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of early detected prostate cancer.World J Urol. 2007 Mar;25(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-007-0145-z. Epub 2007 Feb 14. World J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17364211 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Excess cases of prostate cancer and estimated overdiagnosis associated with PSA testing in East Anglia.Br J Cancer. 2006 Aug 7;95(3):401-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603246. Epub 2006 Jul 11. Br J Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16832417 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical