Short-term fluoride release from various aesthetic restorative materials
- PMID: 12022457
Short-term fluoride release from various aesthetic restorative materials
Abstract
The short-term fluoride release of a giomer (Reactmer), a compomer (Dyract AP), a conventional glass ionomer cement (Fuji II Cap) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC) was evaluated and compared. Specimen discs (6 +/-0.2 mm diameter and 1 +/- 0.2 mm thick) were prepared for each material using custom molds. Each disc was placed in 1 ml of deionized for 24 hours at 37 degrees C. After one day, the water was extracted and analyzed. The specimen discs were then re-immersed into another 1 ml of fresh deionized water. The procedure of removing and refilling the water was repeated for 28 days. Sample solutions taken during the first seven days and at days 14, 21 and 28 were introduced into a capillary electrophoresis system using field amplified sample injection (FASI) to determine fluoride release. Data was analyzed using factorial ANOVA/Scheffe's post-hoc test at significance level 0.05. An initial fluoride "burst" effect was observed with glass ionomers. Both compomer and giomer did not show an initial fluoride "burst" effect. With the exception of the compomer, fluoride release at day one was generally significantly greater than at the other time intervals. The glass ionomers released significantly more fluoride than the compomer and giomer at day one. Although fluoride release of the giomer was significantly greater than the other materials at day seven, it became significantly lower at day 28.
Similar articles
-
Fluoride release from a polyacid-modified resin composite and 3 resin-modified glass-ionomer materials.Quintessence Int. 2000 Apr;31(4):261-6. Quintessence Int. 2000. PMID: 11203934
-
Fluoride release from three glass ionomers, a compomer, and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid.Oper Dent. 2000 Jan-Feb;25(1):20-5. Oper Dent. 2000. PMID: 11203786
-
Fluoride release from fluoride-containing materials.Oper Dent. 1996 Sep-Oct;21(5):185-90. Oper Dent. 1996. PMID: 9484170
-
Resin-ionomer restorative materials for children: a review.Aust Dent J. 1999 Mar;44(1):1-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1999.tb00529.x. Aust Dent J. 1999. PMID: 10217014 Review.
-
Decay-inhibiting restorative materials: past and present.Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998 Oct;19(10):981-4, 986, 988 passim; quiz 992. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998. PMID: 10371881 Review.
Cited by
-
Fluoride release by glass ionomer cements, compomer and giomer.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2009 Fall;6(2):75-81. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2009. PMID: 21528035 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomers, Compomers and Giomers - An Invitro Study.J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jul;9(7):ZC85-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14364.6237. Epub 2015 Jul 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015. PMID: 26393212 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of an alkasite restorative material on the pH of Streptococcus mutans biofilm and dentin remineralization: an in vitro study.BMC Oral Health. 2022 Aug 8;22(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02354-4. BMC Oral Health. 2022. PMID: 35941628 Free PMC article.
-
An In Vitro Study to Compare the Release of Fluoride from Glass Ionomer Cement (Fuji IX) and Zirconomer.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;15(1):35-37. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2141. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022. PMID: 35528493 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release from Four Commercially Available Pediatric Dental Restorative Materials.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Aug;16(Suppl 1):S6-S12. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2621. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023. PMID: 37663215 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous