Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Oct;17(5):353-9.
doi: 10.1023/a:1011971800052.

Impairment of myocardial blood flow reserve in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction: effects of ACE-inhibition with perindopril

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Impairment of myocardial blood flow reserve in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction: effects of ACE-inhibition with perindopril

A F van den Heuvel et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2001 Oct.

Abstract

Myocardial blood flow (MBF) reserve is impaired in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure. Whether this is already present in asymptomatic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and whether it is affected by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, is unknown. We examined MBF in 20 patients with asymptomatic LV dysfunction and compared them to healthy volunteers. MBF (reserve) was assessed with positron emission tomography (PET) and N-13 ammonia at rest, during dipyridamole stress test (DST) and during cold pressor test (CPT). Further, in the LV-dysfunction group, we studied the effects of 3 months treatment with ACE inhibition with a second PET study. Patients were randomized double-blind to perindopril 4 mg daily or placebo. MBF at rest was similar in controls and patients. DST-induced MBF reserve, however, was decreased in patients vs. controls (1.71+/-0.2 vs. 2.62+/-0.5, respectively p < 0.05). Also CPT-induced MBF was lower in patients (1.14+/-0.06 vs. 1.23+/-0.03, p < 0.05). After 3 months double-blind treatment, CPT-induced MBF decreased in the placebo group (from 1.12+/-0.02 to 0.93+/-0.06), but was preserved in the perindopril group (from 1.16+/-0.08 to 1.14+/-0.08 shifts from baseline: -0.19+/-0.05 vs. -0.02+/-0.07 respectively p = 0.07). This was compatible with a trend to a smaller increase in coronary vascular resistance during CPT (1.23+/-0.08 vs. 1.03+/-0.06, placebo vs. perindopril, p = 0.06). In patients with asymptomatic LV dysfunction, MBF, both after vasodilation and after CPT, is already impaired. ACE inhibition with perindopril during this short-term treatment had no significant effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lancet. 2000 Jan 22;355(9200):253-9 - PubMed
    1. Int J Card Imaging. 1993;9 Suppl 1:49-58 - PubMed
    1. Circ Res. 1994 Dec;75(6):1073-7 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Apr;15(5):1032-42 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1979 Apr;59(4):637-43 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources