The effects of spatial attention on motion processing in deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing nonsigners
- PMID: 12027400
- DOI: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1497
The effects of spatial attention on motion processing in deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing nonsigners
Abstract
Visual abilities in deaf individuals may be altered as a result of auditory deprivation and/or because the deaf rely heavily on a sign language (American Sign Language, or ASL). In this study, we asked whether attentional abilities of deaf subjects are altered. Using a direction of motion discrimination task in the periphery, we investigated three aspects of spatial attention: orienting of attention, divided attention, and selective attention. To separate influences of auditory deprivation and sign language experience, we compared three subject groups: deaf and hearing native signers of ASL and hearing nonsigners. To investigate the ability to orient attention, we compared motion thresholds obtained with and without a valid spatial precue, with the notion that subjects orient to the stimulus prior to its appearance when a precue is presented. Results suggest a slight advantage for deaf subjects in the ability to orient spatial attention. To investigate divided attention, we compared motion thresholds obtained when a single motion target was presented to thresholds obtained when the motion target was presented among confusable distractors. The effect of adding distractors was found to be identical across subject groups, suggesting that attentional capacity is not altered in deaf subjects. Finally, to investigate selective attention, we compared performance for a single, cued motion target with that of a cued motion target presented among distractors. Here, deaf, but not hearing, subjects performed better when the motion target was presented among distractors than when it was presented alone, suggesting that deaf subjects are more affected by the presence of distractors. In sum, our results suggest that attentional orienting and selective attention are altered in the deaf and that these effects are most likely due to auditory deprivation as opposed to sign language experience.
Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).
Similar articles
-
Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers.Brain Cogn. 2002 Jun;49(1):170-81. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1498. Brain Cogn. 2002. PMID: 12027401
-
Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement.Neuropsychology. 2007 Jan;21(1):114-21. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.1.114. Neuropsychology. 2007. PMID: 17201534
-
Motion velocity thresholds in deaf signers: changes in lateralization but not in overall sensitivity.Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Sep;21(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.05.002. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 15325408 Clinical Trial.
-
Signed language working memory capacity of signed language interpreters and deaf signers.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2013 Apr;18(2):271-86. doi: 10.1093/deafed/ens068. Epub 2013 Jan 9. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2013. PMID: 23303377 Review.
-
Interview, diagnostic, and legal aspects in the forensic psychiatric assessments of deaf persons.Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1986;14(2):147-62. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1986. PMID: 3524712 Review.
Cited by
-
Unique N170 signatures to words and faces in deaf ASL signers reflect experience-specific adaptations during early visual processing.Neuropsychologia. 2020 Apr;141:107414. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107414. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Neuropsychologia. 2020. PMID: 32142729 Free PMC article.
-
Compensatory plasticity in the deaf brain: effects on perception of music.Brain Sci. 2014 Oct 28;4(4):560-74. doi: 10.3390/brainsci4040560. Brain Sci. 2014. PMID: 25354235 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Foveal Processing Under Concurrent Peripheral Load in Profoundly Deaf Adults.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016 Apr;21(2):122-8. doi: 10.1093/deafed/env054. Epub 2015 Dec 10. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016. PMID: 26657078 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Predict and Measure Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Scoping Review.Brain Sci. 2021 Oct 28;11(11):1439. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111439. Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 34827438 Free PMC article.
-
Cross-Modal and Intra-Modal Characteristics of Visual Function and Speech Perception Performance in Postlingually Deafened, Cochlear Implant Users.PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148466. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26848755 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical