Retrospective clinical studies in surgery: potentials and pitfalls
- PMID: 12027483
- DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2001.0703
Retrospective clinical studies in surgery: potentials and pitfalls
Abstract
As many surgical studies are performed retrospectively, it is desirable to improve the conduct, analysis and reporting of such research designs. This article reviews some of the most common forms of bias encountered in clinical research and outlines various types of study design and analysis that can help to minimize the amount of bias introduced into the results. We describe the advantages and disadvantages of 'raw' data analysis, stratified analysis, matched pair analysis and multivariate analysis, and apply them to an example of a hypothetical hand surgery study.
Copyright 2002 The British Society for Surgery of the Hand.
Comment in
-
Retrospective clinical studies.J Hand Surg Br. 2002 Oct;27(5):492; author reply 493. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2002.0849. J Hand Surg Br. 2002. PMID: 12512516 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
