Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Jun;5(2):104-13.
doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00166.x.

Psychological benefits of prostate cancer screening: the role of reassurance

Scott B Cantor  1 , Robert J Volk, Alvah R Cass, Jawaria Gilani, Stephen J Spann
Affiliations

Psychological benefits of prostate cancer screening: the role of reassurance

Scott B Cantor et al. Health Expect. 2002 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: The role of reassurance in decision-making about screening for health problems is largely unknown. We examined the reassurance value of prostate cancer screening in primary care patients.

Setting and participants: One hundred and sixty eight men, aged 45-70 years, who had no history of prostate cancer, from three family medicine practices in southeast Texas.

Methods: A hypothetical scenario was developed where men were asked to assume they did not have prostate cancer, and then to rank three predefined screening states with regard to reassurance value: (A) unknown (no screening), (B) normal by screening [a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test and a digital rectal examination (DRE)] and (C) normal by biopsy (abnormal PSA test and DRE results but a negative ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy).

Results: Most of the men (96.8%) associated some reassurance value with screening, considering health state A to be the worst possible health state. Results from a multivariate analysis showed that preference for screening state C was associated with a family history of prostate cancer and perceived greater risk for prostate cancer compared with other men.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that prostate cancer screening may have some reassurance value for men, and that increased risk status may explain why some men prefer the added reassurance afforded by screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Cancer Society . Cancer Facts and Figures – 1999 Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 1999.
    1. Coley CM, Barry MJ, Fleming C, Mulley AG. Early detection of prostate cancer. Part I: prior probability and effectiveness of tests. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1997; 126 : 394 – 406. - PubMed
    1. Djulbegovic B, Hozo I, Schwartz A, McMasters KM. Acceptable regret in medical decision making. Medical Hypotheses, 1999; 53 : 253 – 259.DOI: 10.1054/mehy.1998.0020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poses RM, De Saintonge DM, McClish DK et al. An international comparison of physicians' judgments of outcome rates of cardiac procedures and attitudes toward risk, uncertainty, justifiability, and regret. Medical Decision Making, 1998; 18 : 131 – 140. - PubMed
    1. Close DR, Kristal AR, Li S, Patterson RE, White E. Associations of demographic and health‐related characteristics with prostate cancer screening in Washington State. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 1998; 7 : 627 – 630. - PubMed

Publication types