Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2002 Jun;25(6):995-1001.
doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.6.995.

Clinical, autoimmune, and genetic characteristics of adult-onset diabetic patients with GAD autoantibodies in Japan (Ehime Study)

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Clinical, autoimmune, and genetic characteristics of adult-onset diabetic patients with GAD autoantibodies in Japan (Ehime Study)

Haruyo Takeda et al. Diabetes Care. 2002 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To characterize the clinical, autoimmune, and genetic features in Japanese adult-onset diabetic patients with GAD autoantibodies.

Research design and methods: GAD autoantibodies (GADab) were screened in 4,980 diabetic patients with age of onset >20 years in the hospital-based Ehime Study, and the GADab-positive (GADab(+)) patients were then divided into two groups according to their insulin secretion and compared with nondiabetic subjects. The insulin-deficient state was defined as <0.33 nmol/l serum C-peptide (CPR) at 2 h postprandial or 6 min after a 1-mg glucagon load.

Results: GADab was detected in 188 (3.8%) of the 4,980 diabetic patients tested. Of these patients, 72 (38.3%) were classified as insulin deficient, 97 (51.6%) were classified as non-insulin deficient, and 19 (10.1%) were unclassified. The GADab(+) insulin-deficient patients were characterized by young age at onset of diabetes, low BMI, low maximum BMI, and high levels of HbA(1c). The prevalence of IA-2 autoantibodies and thyrogastric autoantibodies in the GADab(+) insulin-deficient patients were significantly higher than those in the GADab(+) non-insulin-deficient patients (P < 0.05). GADab(+) patients with insulin deficiency had increased frequencies of HLA DRB1*0405-DQB1*0401, *0802-*0302, and *0901-*0303 haplotypes, whereas the frequency of only HLA DRB1*0405-DQB1*0401 was increased in the case of GADab(+) non-insulin-deficient patients. Of note is the fact that the GADab(+) non-insulin-deficient group did not differ from healthy control subjects with respect to type 1 diabetes protective haplotype HLA DRB1*1502-DQB1*0601. A total of 13% of the GADab(+) patients with diabetes had genotypes comprising the DRB1*1501-DQB1*0602 or *1502-*0601 and were characterized by old age at onset of diabetes, high BMI, resistance to the insulin-deficient state, low titer of GADab, and low frequency of other organ-specific autoantibodies.

Conclusions: We conclude that GADab(+) non-insulin-deficient patients differ from GADab(+) patients with insulin deficiency with respect to clinical characteristics, humoral autoimmunity to other organ-specific autoantibodies, as well as HLA class II genes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms