Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 May 28;105(21):2482-6.
doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000017199.09457.3d.

Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: validation in humans

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: validation in humans

Nico H J Pijls et al. Circulation. .

Abstract

Background: Guide wire-based simultaneous measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) is important to understand microvascular disease of the heart. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of simultaneous measurement of FFR and CFR by one pressure-temperature sensor-tipped guide wire with the use of coronary thermodilution and to compare CFR by thermodilution (CFR(thermo)) with simultaneously measured Doppler CFR (CFR(Doppl)).

Methods and results: In 103 coronary arteries in 50 patients, a pressure-temperature sensor-tipped 0.014-inch floppy guide wire and a 0.014-inch Doppler guide wire were introduced. Both normal vessels and a wide range of stenotic vessels were included. With 3 mL of saline at room temperature used as an indicator, by hand-injection, thermodilution curves in the coronary artery were obtained in triplicate, both at baseline and at intravenous adenosine-induced maximum hyperemia. After adequate curve-fitting, CFR(thermo) was calculated from the ratio of inverse mean transit times and compared with CFR(Doppl) calculated by velocities at hyperemia and baseline. Adequate sets of thermodilution curves and corresponding CFR(thermo) could be obtained in 87% of the arteries versus 91% for Doppler CFR and 100% for FFR. CFR(thermo) correlated fairly well to CFR(Doppl) (CFR(thermo)=0.84 CFR(Doppl)+0.17; r=0.80; P<0.001), although individual differences of >20% between both indexes were seen in a quarter of all arteries.

Conclusions: This study shows the feasibility of simultaneous measurement of FFR (by coronary pressure) and CFR (by coronary thermodilution) in humans by one single guide wire in a practical and straightforward way and will facilitate assessment of microvascular disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources