Siderophore typing, a powerful tool for the identification of fluorescent and nonfluorescent pseudomonads
- PMID: 12039729
- PMCID: PMC123936
- DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.6.2745-2753.2002
Siderophore typing, a powerful tool for the identification of fluorescent and nonfluorescent pseudomonads
Abstract
A total of 301 strains of fluorescent pseudomonads previously characterized by conventional phenotypic and/or genomic taxonomic methods were analyzed through siderotyping, i.e., by the isoelectrophoretic characterization of their main siderophores and pyoverdines and determination of the pyoverdine-mediated iron uptake specificity of the strains. As a general rule, strains within a well-circumscribed taxonomic group, namely the species Pseudomonas brassicacearum, Pseudomonas fuscovaginae, Pseudomonas jessenii, Pseudomonas mandelii, Pseudomonas monteilii, "Pseudomonas mosselii," "Pseudomonas palleronii," Pseudomonas rhodesiae, "Pseudomonas salomonii," Pseudomonas syringae, Pseudomonas thivervalensis, Pseudomonas tolaasii, and Pseudomonas veronii and the genomospecies FP1, FP2, and FP3 produced an identical pyoverdine which, in addition, was characteristic of the group, since it was structurally different from the pyoverdines produced by the other groups. In contrast, 28 strains belonging to the notoriously heterogeneous Pseudomonas fluorescens species were characterized by great heterogeneity at the pyoverdine level. The study of 23 partially characterized phenotypic clusters demonstrated that siderotyping is very useful in suggesting correlations between clusters and well-defined species and in detecting misclassified individual strains, as verified by DNA-DNA hybridization. The usefulness of siderotyping as a determinative tool was extended to the nonfluorescent species Pseudomonas corrugata, Pseudomonas frederiksbergensis, Pseudomonas graminis, and Pseudomonas plecoglossicida, which were seen to have an identical species-specific siderophore system and thus were easily differentiated from one another. Thus, the fast, accurate, and easy-to-perform siderotyping method compares favorably with the usual phenotypic and genomic methods presently necessary for accurate identification of pseudomonads at the species level.
Figures
References
-
- Achouak, W., L. Sutra, T. Heulin, J.-M. Meyer, N. Fromin, S. Degreave, R. Christen, and L. Gardan. 2000. Description of Pseudomonas brassicacearum sp. nov. and Pseudomonas thivervalensis sp. nov., root-associated bacteria isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica napus. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50:9-18. - PubMed
-
- Amann, C., K. Taraz, H. Budzikiewicz, and J.-M. Meyer. 2000. The siderophores of Pseudomonas fluorescens 18.1 and the importance of cyclopeptidic substructures for the recognition at the cell surface. Z. Naturforsch. 55c:671-680. - PubMed
-
- Andersen, S. M., K. Johnsen, J. Sorensen, P. Nielsen, and C. S. Jacobsen. 2000. Pseudomonas frederiksbergensis sp. nov., isolated from soil at a coal gasification site. Int. J. Syst. Environ. Microbiol. 50:1957-1964. - PubMed
-
- Anzai, Y., H. Kim, J.-Y. Park, H. Wakabayashi, and H. Oyaizu. 2000. Phylogenic affiliation of the pseudomonads based on 16S rRNA sequence. Int. J. Syst. E vol. Microbiol. 50:1563-1589. - PubMed
-
- Barclay, R., and C. Ratledge. 1988. Mycobactins and exochelins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. africanum and other related species. J. Gen. Microbiol. 134:771-776. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials
