Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 Jun:180:485-9.
doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.6.485.

Rapid tranquillisation: time for a reappraisal of options for parenteral therapy

Affiliations
Review

Rapid tranquillisation: time for a reappraisal of options for parenteral therapy

R Hamish McAllister-Williams et al. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jun.

Abstract

Background: When parenteral treatments are indicated for acutely disturbed behaviour, previous guidelines have recommended droperidol or haloperidol in combination with benzodiazepines. However, there has been recent concern over cardiotoxicity and sudden death associated with some antipsychotic medication and droperidol has now been withdrawn.

Aims: To ascertain what alternatives can be recommended to replace intramuscular droperidol.

Method: Selective review of current guidelines and the literature pertaining to rapid parenteral tranquillisation.

Results: Current guidelines recommend haloperidol as an alternative to droperidol. There is evidence of cardiotoxicity with haloperidol and it has a propensity to cause extrapyramidal side-effects that may exacerbate disturbed behaviour and reduce longer-term compliance. The rapid-acting intramuscular formulations of atypical antipsychotic agents show promise.

Conclusions: It is recommended that the mainstay of pharmacological rapid tranquillisation should be parenteral benzodiazepines used with due care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms