Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 Jun;20(6):581-6.
doi: 10.1038/nbt0602-581.

Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops

Affiliations
Review

Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops

Henry Daniell. Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Jun.

Erratum in

  • Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Aug;20(8):843.

Abstract

The potential of genetically modified (GM) crops to transfer foreign genes through pollen to related plant species has been cited as an environmental concern. Until more is known concerning the environmental impact of novel genes on indigenous crops and weeds, practical and regulatory considerations will likely require the adoption of gene-containment approaches for future generations of GM crops. Most molecular approaches with potential for controlling gene flow among crops and weeds have thus far focused on maternal inheritance, male sterility, and seed sterility. Several other containment strategies may also prove useful in restricting gene flow, including apomixis (vegetative propagation and asexual seed formation), cleistogamy (self-fertilization without opening of the flower), genome incompatibility, chemical induction/deletion of transgenes, fruit-specific excision of transgenes, and transgenic mitigation (transgenes that compromise fitness in the hybrid). As yet, however, no strategy has proved broadly applicable to all crop species, and a combination of approaches may prove most effective for engineering the next generation of GM crops.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Potential strategies for restricting gene flow. (A) By restricting flower opening and floral development (cleistogamy) in a GM crop, pollen dispersal and outcrossing could be prevented, thereby mitigating gene flow. (B) Gene flow through pollen could be restricted via chloroplast engineering, male-sterility approaches (including tapetum-specific excision of transgenes), and genome incompatibility. (C) Gene flow through seeds could be restricted by seed-sterility approaches (including seed-specific excision of transgenes) and apomixis.

References

    1. Hurst LD. Cytoplasmic genetics under inbreeding and outbreeding. Proc. Royal Soc. London B. 1994;258:287–298.
    1. Gressel J. Molecular Biology in Weed Control. Taylor and Francis; London: 2002.
    1. Vielle-Calzada JP, Baskar R, Grossniklaus U. Delayed activation of the paternal genome during seed development. Nature. 2000;404:91–94. - PubMed
    1. Avni A, Edelman M. Direct selection for paternal inheritance of chloroplasts in sexual progeny of Nicotiana. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1991;225:273–277. - PubMed
    1. Corriveau JP, Coleman AW. Rapid screening method to detect potential biparental inheritance of plastid DNA and results for over 200 angiosperm species. Am. J. Botany. 1988;75:1443–1458.

MeSH terms