Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Jun 6;346(23):1773-80.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012843.

A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization

Affiliations
Free article
Clinical Trial

A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization

Marie-Claude Morice et al. N Engl J Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: The need for repeated treatment of restenosis of a treated vessel remains the main limitation of percutaneous coronary revascularization. Because sirolimus (rapamycin) inhibits the proliferation of lymphocytes and smooth-muscle cells, we compared a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard uncoated stent in patients with angina pectoris.

Methods: We performed a randomized, double-blind trial to compare the two types of stents for revascularization of single, primary lesions in native coronary arteries. The trial included 238 patients at 19 medical centers. The primary end point was in-stent late luminal loss (the difference between the minimal luminal diameter immediately after the procedure and the diameter at six months). Secondary end points included the percentage of in-stent stenosis of the luminal diameter and the rate of restenosis (luminal narrowing of 50 percent or more). We also analyzed a composite clinical end point consisting of death, myocardial infarction, and percutaneous or surgical revascularization at 1, 6, and 12 months.

Results: At six months, the degree of neointimal proliferation, manifested as the mean (+/-SD) late luminal loss, was significantly lower in the sirolimus-stent group (-0.01+/-0.33 mm) than in the standard-stent group (0.80+/-0.53 mm, P<0.001). None of the patients in the sirolimus-stent group, as compared with 26.6 percent of those in the standard-stent group, had restenosis of 50 percent or more of the luminal diameter (P<0.001). There were no episodes of stent thrombosis. During a follow-up period of up to one year, the overall rate of major cardiac events was 5.8 percent in the sirolimus-stent group and 28.8 percent in the standard-stent group (P<0.001). The difference was due entirely to a higher rate of revascularization of the target vessel in the standard-stent group.

Conclusions: As compared with a standard coronary stent, a sirolimus-eluting stent shows considerable promise for the prevention of neointimal proliferation, restenosis, and associated clinical events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Sirolimus-eluting coronary stents.
    Curfman GD. Curfman GD. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 6;346(23):1770-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200206063462302. N Engl J Med. 2002. PMID: 12050335 No abstract available.
  • Sirolimus-eluting coronary stents.
    Sharma S, Bhambi B, Nyitray W. Sharma S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1285; author reply 1285. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200210173471619. N Engl J Med. 2002. PMID: 12393833 No abstract available.
  • Arterial stents as a therapeutic platform.
    Roitberg B. Roitberg B. Surg Neurol. 2003 Mar;59(3):146-7. Surg Neurol. 2003. PMID: 12693402 No abstract available.

MeSH terms