Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 Feb;3(1):33-40.
doi: 10.1007/s11864-002-0039-7.

Cervical lymph node metastases from occult squamous cell carcinoma

Affiliations
Review

Cervical lymph node metastases from occult squamous cell carcinoma

Carsten Nieder et al. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2002 Feb.

Abstract

Depending on patient and tumor characteristics, reported 5-year actuarial survival rates of patients with cervical nodal metastasis from an unknown primary carcinoma range from 18% to 63%. Prognostic factors for survival include N-stage, number of nodes, grading, extracapsular extension, and performance status. Retrospective studies suggest that neck relapse is more common than are distant metastases or emergence of mucosal primary tumors. The treatment options include neck dissection alone, radiation alone to the neck with or without the putative mucosal origin, and combination unilateral neck dissection plus limited or comprehensive radiotherapy. Combination of nodal dissection with comprehensive bilateral radiotherapy yielded most favorable results in local-regional disease control. However, its impact on the quality of life should be recognized. Also, the confounding effects of patient selection for various treatment modalities on therapeutic outcome cannot be quantified. Retrospective single-institution comparisons between comprehensive and unilateral neck radiotherapy did not show apparent differences in outcome. A randomized trial to compare the therapeutic value of comprehensive versus volume-limited radiotherapy is being planned. No data were found to support the benefit of chemotherapy for the treatment of this disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 May 1;50(1):55-63 - PubMed
    1. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1998 Apr;23(2):158-63 - PubMed
    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990 Feb;18(2):289-94 - PubMed
    1. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1997;9(5):322-9 - PubMed
    1. Strahlenther Onkol. 1997 Jul;173(7):362-8 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources