[Comparative study on objective-setting public health policy--historical background and path dependence]
- PMID: 12061096
- DOI: 10.1265/jjh.57.498
[Comparative study on objective-setting public health policy--historical background and path dependence]
Abstract
The historical background and the path dependence of objective-setting public health policy are described in this review. The New Public Health movement appeared in the 1980s and was inspired by the Ottawa Charter on Health Promotion. This movement is based on the idea that public health is mostly promoted by creating a supportive environment for health as well as by individual efforts toward a healthy life style. The first objective-setting public health policy called Healthy People was proposed in USA, 1979, under the influence of The Lalonde Report published in Canada, 1974. Goals and targets were set in order to reduce the mortality of American people. This project led to Healthy People 2000 and Healthy People 2010. In the 1990s, objective-setting public health policies prevailed in Western countries, such as United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and also in Japan. The objective-setting public health policy is the application of the management by objectives in the health policy domain. This policy is especially accepted in Anglo-Saxon countries where public sector reform was conducted on the basis of the New Public Management theory in the 1980s, which is when the WHO Regional Office for Europe started the Healthy Cities project that emphasized a network of project cities. The Health 21 in 1999 is another model of object-setting public health policy. A comparative study of four different objective-setting public health policies (USA, United Kingdom, WHO Regional Office for Europe, and Japan) was conducted regarding the goals and domains of the targets, methods of targeting, and evaluation of the project. The goals were almost identical in the four public health policies, while the domains of the targets were different. These differences were explained by the past experience of public health policy development in each country.
Similar articles
-
A review of major influences on current public health policy in developed countries in the second half of the 20th century.J R Soc Promot Health. 2006 Mar;126(2):73-8. doi: 10.1177/1466424006063182. J R Soc Promot Health. 2006. PMID: 16562775 Review.
-
Reinventing public health: a new perspective on the health of Canadians and its international impact.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Nov;61(11):955-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.046912. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007. PMID: 17933952 Free PMC article.
-
The health-promotion perspective in public-health plans in a Swedish region over three decades.Health Promot Int. 2013 Jun;28(2):269-80. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das009. Epub 2012 Mar 23. Health Promot Int. 2013. PMID: 22447353
-
[Decisions have a history and a past: nosocomial infections].Sante Publique. 2008 Jul-Aug;20(4):353-6. doi: 10.3917/spub.084.0353. Sante Publique. 2008. PMID: 19014086 French. No abstract available.
-
[Healthy Cities projects in Europe].Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2002 May;57(2):484-9. doi: 10.1265/jjh.57.484. Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2002. PMID: 12061094 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Path Dependence and Universal Health Coverage: The Case of Egypt.Front Public Health. 2017 Dec 8;5:325. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00325. eCollection 2017. Front Public Health. 2017. PMID: 29276704 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous