The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change
- PMID: 12061768
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03194948
The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change
Abstract
The irrelevant-speech effect refers to the finding of impaired recall performance in the presence of irrelevant auditory stimuli. Two broad classes of theories exist for the effect, both allowing automatic entry of the distracting sounds into the processing system but differing in how attention is involved. As one source of evidence in the discussion of existing theories of the irrelevant-speech effect, the performance of children and adults on a visual serial recall task with irrelevant sounds (speech and tones) was examined. The magnitude of the effects of irrelevant sounds on performance decreased with age. The developmental differences were marked in the conditions with the greatest need for attentional control (words and especially changing words). The findings were interpreted with respect to current models of memory. Theories of the irrelevant-speech effect that include a role for attentional control were better suited to handle the results than those without a specified role for attention.
Similar articles
-
Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.Mem Cognit. 2023 Feb;51(2):307-320. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01359-2. Epub 2022 Oct 3. Mem Cognit. 2023. PMID: 36190658 Free PMC article.
-
Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: the relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Mar;23(2):472-83. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.2.472. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997. PMID: 9080015
-
Irrelevant speech, changing state, and order information.Mem Cognit. 2023 Nov;51(8):1836-1848. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01437-z. Epub 2023 Jun 16. Mem Cognit. 2023. PMID: 37326785
-
Irrelevant speech and serial recall: implications for theories of attention and working memory.Scand J Psychol. 1992 Sep;33(3):212-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1992.tb00911.x. Scand J Psychol. 1992. PMID: 1488646 Review.
-
Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Sep;7(3):403-23. doi: 10.3758/bf03214356. Psychon Bull Rev. 2000. PMID: 11082850 Review.
Cited by
-
Metacognition in Auditory Distraction: How Expectations about Distractibility Influence the Irrelevant Sound Effect.J Cogn. 2017 Nov 30;1(1):2. doi: 10.5334/joc.3. J Cogn. 2017. PMID: 31517180 Free PMC article.
-
Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children.Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 30;4:578. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00578. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 24009598 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An analysis of error patterns in children's backward digit recall in noise.Noise Health. 2015 Jul-Aug;17(77):191-7. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.160684. Noise Health. 2015. PMID: 26168949 Free PMC article.
-
Loud Auditory Distractors Are More Difficult to Ignore After All.Exp Psychol. 2022 May;69(3):163-171. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000554. Exp Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36255065 Free PMC article.
-
Sound source location modulates the irrelevant-sound effect.Mem Cognit. 2008 Apr;36(3):617-28. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.3.617. Mem Cognit. 2008. PMID: 18491501
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials