Effect of early pregnancy on a previous lower segment cesarean section scar
- PMID: 12065130
- DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00018-8
Effect of early pregnancy on a previous lower segment cesarean section scar
Abstract
Objective: To summarize the manifestation, diagnosis, and early management of early pregnancy on a previous cesarean section scar.
Method: Fifteen cases of early pregnancies implanted on previous cesarean section scars were diagnosed and treated in two obstetrical centers.
Results: The 15 patients had light, painless vaginal bleeding and their serum beta-subunit human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-HCG) was elevated. The interval between cesarean section and admission ranged from 6 months to 12 years (7.1+/-3.6 years). Doppler and real-time ultrasonic examinations demonstrated an enlargement of the previous cesarean section scar in the lower segment, a gestational sac or a mixed mass attached to the cicatrix, and a very thin myometrium between the gestational sac and the bladder wall. Serum beta-HCG dropped to normal in 12 of the 15 patients following treatment with crystalline trichosanthin injected into the cervix followed by oral mifepristone, intramuscular injections of methotrexate, or other appropriate treatment. Two patients underwent total hysterectomy due to massive vaginal bleeding. The remaining patient was misdiagnosed with choriocarcinoma and also had total hysterectomy.
Conclusion: Pregnancy on a previous lower segment cesarean section scar is rare but very dangerous. Early diagnosis and effective conservative drug treatment may be instrumental in decreasing the occurrence of uterine rupture.
Similar articles
-
Complication of cesarean section: pregnancy on the cicatrix of a previous cesarean section.Chin Med J (Engl). 2002 Feb;115(2):242-6. Chin Med J (Engl). 2002. PMID: 11940341
-
Ectopic pregnancies in caesarean section scars: 5 years experience.Clin Imaging. 2020 Oct;66:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.04.037. Epub 2020 May 3. Clin Imaging. 2020. PMID: 32442857 Review.
-
Laparoscopic Resection of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 May-Jun;24(4):533-535. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 17. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 27867050
-
Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;23(3):247-53. doi: 10.1002/uog.974. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15027012
-
Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Feb;303(2):321-328. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05877-9. Epub 2020 Nov 21. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021. PMID: 33219842
Cited by
-
Caesarean scar pregnancy at 19 weeks gestation.Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2011 Aug;14(3):31-33. doi: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2011.tb00121.x. Epub 2015 Dec 31. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2011. PMID: 28191118 Free PMC article.
-
Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy vs. uterine curettage in the uterine artery embolization-based management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a cohort study.Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Sep 15;7(9):2793-803. eCollection 2014. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014. PMID: 25356141 Free PMC article.
-
A rare case report of heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancy in the 8th week of gestation that was managed successfully by exploratory laparotomy with dilation and curettage.Clin Case Rep. 2024 Jun 2;12(6):e9025. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.9025. eCollection 2024 Jun. Clin Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 38831983 Free PMC article.
-
Uterine mass after caesarean section: a report of two cases.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Sep 3;20(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03213-2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020. PMID: 32883223 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors and consequences of undiagnosed cesarean scar pregnancy: a cohort study in China.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 26;19(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2523-0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019. PMID: 31655570 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical