Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2002 Jun 15;324(7351):1426.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1426.

Interventions to reduce unintended pregnancies among adolescents: systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Interventions to reduce unintended pregnancies among adolescents: systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Alba DiCenso et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To review the effectiveness of primary prevention strategies aimed at delaying sexual intercourse, improving use of birth control, and reducing incidence of unintended pregnancy in adolescents.

Data sources: 12 electronic bibliographic databases, 10 key journals, citations of relevant articles, and contact with authors.

Study selection: 26 trials described in 22 published and unpublished reports that randomised adolescents to an intervention or a control group (alternate intervention or nothing).

Data extraction: Two independent reviewers assessed methodological quality and abstracted data.

Data synthesis: The interventions did not delay initiation of sexual intercourse in young women (pooled odds ratio 1.12; 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.30) or young men (0.99; 0.84 to 1.16); did not improve use of birth control by young women at every intercourse (0.95; 0.69 to 1.30) or at last intercourse (1.05; 0.50 to 2.19) or by young men at every intercourse (0.90; 0.70 to 1.16) or at last intercourse (1.25; 0.99 to 1.59); and did not reduce pregnancy rates in young women (1.04; 0.78 to 1.40). Four abstinence programmes and one school based sex education programme were associated with an increase in number of pregnancies among partners of young male participants (1.54; 1.03 to 2.29). There were significantly fewer pregnancies in young women who received a multifaceted programme (0.41; 0.20 to 0.83), though baseline differences in this study favoured the intervention.

Conclusions: Primary prevention strategies evaluated to date do not delay the initiation of sexual intercourse, improve use of birth control among young men and women, or reduce the number of pregnancies in young women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of interventions on whether adolescents started to have sexual intercourse
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of interventions on whether adolescents always used birth control
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of interventions on whether adolescents used birth control the last time they had sexual intercourse
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of interventions on rates of pregnancy in adolescent women
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of interventions on rates of pregnancy in partners of young men

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. DiCenso A, Van Dover LJ. Prevention of adolescent pregnancy. In: Stewart MJ, editor. Community nursing: promoting Canadians' health. 2nd ed. Toronto, ON: W B Saunders; 1999.
    1. Brown SS, Eisenberg L, editors. The best intentions: unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1995. - PubMed
    1. Moore KA, Myers DE, Morrison DR, Nord CW, Brown B, Edmonston B. Age at first childbirth and later poverty. J Res Adolesc. 1993;3:393–422. - PubMed
    1. Geronimus AT, Korenman S. The socioeconomic consequences of teen childbearing reconsidered. Q J Economics. 1992;107:1187–1214.
    1. Stevens-Simon C, White MM. Adolescent pregnancy. Pediatr Ann. 1991;20:322–331. - PubMed

Publication types