Communicable disease and infection control: the surveillance contribution

Abstract

In its much-publicized report (2000) the National Audit Office (NAO) has emphasized the important part surveillance plays in determining infection rates and infection control in general. Community nurses may be forgiven for pointing out that this report concentrates on hospitals, however it strongly recommends that surveillance be extended out into the community. This is a sensible move as studies quoted in the NAO report indicate that 50-70% of surgical wound infection occur during the post-discharge period. The boundaries between acute and primary care are becoming ever more blurred; increasing numbers of susceptible patients are being managed in the community and the number of invasive procedures carried out is rising in line with government policy. Action to control infection extends beyond the narrow boundaries of health care to involve the whole population, and although the idea of extending the surveillance of healthcare related infection from hospital to community settings appears to be relatively new, the surveillance of infectious diseases that occur in the community is not. It is, in effect, a key proactive infection control activity which facilitates targeted and effective infection control measures. This article aims to define and explain surveillance as it relates to infection control and communicable disease control in the community by using examples from history, the current Meningitis C vaccination programme and the surveillance of hospital-acquired infection in the USA.