The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture
- PMID: 12066117
- DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.122416
The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture
Abstract
Objective: Our purpose was to measure the impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture at subsequent delivery.
Study design: This is an observational cohort study of all women undergoing a trial of labor from 1988 to 2000 in a tertiary care center, after a single low transverse cesarean delivery. Factors most highly associated with uterine rupture were identified by using univariate regression analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for selected confounding variables.
Results: Of the 2142 women who met the study criteria, 1980 (92.4%) had maternal records and original operative reports reviewed. After adjustments were made for confounding variables, the odds ratio for uterine rupture in women with a single-layer closure was 3.95 (95% CI, 1.35-11.49).
Conclusion: A single-layer closure of the previous lower segment incision was the most influential factor and was associated with a 4-fold increase in the risk of uterine rupture compared with a double-layer closure.
Comment in
-
The impact of a single- or double-layer closure on uterine rupture.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;188(1):295-6; author reply 296. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(03)70131-8. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003. PMID: 12548235 No abstract available.
-
Impact of single- or double-layer closure on uterine rupture.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb;188(2):601; author reply 601-2. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.148. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003. PMID: 12592285 No abstract available.
-
Impact of single-or double-layer closure on uterine rupture.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb;188(2):602-3; author reply 603. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003. PMID: 12592287 No abstract available.
-
The impact of a single- or double-layer closure on uterine rupture.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;189(3):895; author reply 895-6. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00637-9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003. PMID: 14560747 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
