Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002;2002(2):CD001231.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001231.

Ambulatory versus conventional methods for monitoring blood pressure during pregnancy

E Bergel  1 , G Carroli, F Althabe
Affiliations

Ambulatory versus conventional methods for monitoring blood pressure during pregnancy

E Bergel et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002.

Abstract

Background: Hypertensive disorders are among the most common medical complications of pregnancy and a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality world-wide. Blood pressure measurement plays a central role in the screening and management of hypertension during pregnancy. In recent years the validity of conventional (clinic) blood pressure measurement has been questioned and efforts have been made to improve the technique with ambulatory automated devices that provide a large number of measurements over a period of time, usually a 24-hour period.

Objectives: To assess whether the use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during pregnancy improves subsequent maternal and feto-neonatal outcomes, women-newborn quality of life or use of health service resources, compared with conventional (clinic) blood pressure measurements. These effects will be assessed for the following subgroups: (1) Women at low or average risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (unselected). (2) Women defined as high risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. (3) Women with hypertension without other signs of pre-eclampsia. (4) Women with established pre-eclampsia.

Search strategy: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, LILACS and EMBASE were searched. Date of last search: July 2001.

Selection criteria: All randomised trials comparing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring versus conventional (clinic) blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy. Quasi-random designs will be excluded.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers evaluated all potentially relevant articles, examined each study for possible inclusion and assessed the methodological quality using the Cochrane guidelines.

Main results: No trials included.

Reviewer's conclusions: There is no randomised controlled trial evidence to support the use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during pregnancy. Randomized trials with adequate design and sample sizes are needed to evaluate the possible advantages and risks of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during pregnancy, in particular in hypertensive pregnant women. These trials should evaluate not only clinical outcomes, but also use of health care resources and women's views.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies awaiting assessment

Rhodes 2005 {published data only}
    1. Rhodes C, Churchill D. A randomised comparison of ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM), versus conventional blood pressure measurement, for the management of pregnant hypertensive women [abstract]. Hypertension in Pregnancy 2006;25(Suppl 1):166.
    1. Rhodes C, Churchill D. Randomized comparison of ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM), versus conventional blood pressure measurement, for the management of pregnant hypertensive women [abstract]. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2005;25 Suppl 1:S16.
Ross‐McGill 2000 {published data only}
    1. Ross‐McGill H, Hewison J, Hirst J, Dowswell T, Holt A, Brunskill P, et al. Antenatal home blood pressure monitoring : a pilot randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2000;107(2):217‐21. - PubMed

Additional references

Bellomo 1999
    1. Bellomo G, Narducci PL, Rondoni F, Pastorelli G, Stangoni G, Angeli G, et al. Prognostic value of 24‐hour blood pressure in pregnancy. JAMA 1999;282(15):1447‐52. - PubMed
Brown 1992
    1. Brown MA, Simpson JM. Diversity of blood pressure recording during pregnancy: implications for the hypertensive disorders. Medical Journal of Australia 1992;156:306‐8. - PubMed
Carney 1997
    1. Carney S. 24‐hour blood pressure monitoring: what are the benefits?. Australian Prescriber 1997;20:18‐20.
Conde‐Agudelo 1993
    1. Conde‐Agudelo A, Belizan JM, Lede R, Bergel EF. What does an elevated mean arterial pressure in the second half of pregnancy predict‐‐gestational hypertension or preeclampsia?. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993;169(3):509‐14. - PubMed
Duley 1992
    1. Duley L. Maternal mortality associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1992;99(7):547‐53. - PubMed
Greer 1993
    1. Greer IA. Ambulatory blood pressure in pregnancy: measurements and machines. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1993;100(10):887‐9. - PubMed
Higgins 1997
    1. Higgins JR, Walshe JJ, Hallingan A, O'Brien E, Conroy R, Darling MR. Can 24‐hours ambulatory blood pressure measurement predict the development of hypertension in primigravidae?. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1997;105:1177‐84. - PubMed
Higgins 2001
    1. Higgins JR, Swiet M. Blood‐pressure measurement and classification in pregnancy. Lancet 2001;357(9250):131‐5. - PubMed
Kaunitz 1985
    1. Kaunitz AM, Hughes JM, Grimes DA, Smith JC, Rochat RW, Kafrissen ME. Causes of maternal mortality in the United States. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1985;65(5):605‐12. - PubMed
Lancet 1998
    1. Anonymous. The screening muddle. Lancet [letter; comment] 1998;351(9101):459. - PubMed
MacGillivray 1969
    1. MacGillivray I, Rose GA, Rowe B. Blood pressure survey in pregnancy. Clinical Science 1969;37(2):395‐407. - PubMed
Naeye 1979
    1. Naeye RL, Friedman EA. Causes of perinatal death associated with gestational hypertension and proteinuria. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1979;133(1):8‐10. - PubMed
Natarajan 1999
    1. Natarajan P, Shennan AH, Penny J, Halligan AW, Swiet M, Anthony J. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric automated blood pressure monitors in the setting of preeclampsia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999;181(5 Pt 1):1203‐10. - PubMed
O'Brien 2001
    1. O'Brien E, Beevers G, Lip GY. ABC of hypertension. Blood pressure measurement. Part III‐automated sphygmomanometry: ambulatory blood pressure measurement. BMJ 2001;322(7294):1110‐4. - PMC - PubMed
O'Brien 2001b
    1. O'Brien E, Beevers G, Lip GY. ABC of hypertension: Blood pressure measurement. Part IV‐automated sphygmomanometry: self blood pressure measurement. BMJ 2001;322(7295):1167‐70. - PMC - PubMed
Page 1976
    1. Page EW, Christianson R. The impact of mean arterial pressure in the middle trimester upon the outcome of pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1976;125(6):740‐6. - PubMed
Perry 1991
    1. Perry IJ, Wilkinson LS, Shiton RA, Beevers DG. Conflicting views on the measurement of blood pressure in pregnancy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1991;98:241‐3. - PubMed
Sackett 1991
    1. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Gordon HG, Tugwell P. Clinical Epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine. 2nd Edition. Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1991.
Sibai 1991
    1. Sibai BM. Diagnosis and management of chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991;78(3 Pt 1):451‐61. - PubMed
Sibai 1996
    1. Sibai BM. Treatment of hypertension in pregnant women. New England Journal of Medicine 1996;335(4):257‐65. - PubMed
Staessen 1997
    1. Staessen JA, Byttebier G, Buntinx F, Celis H, O'Brien ET, Fagard R. Antihypertensive treatment based on conventional or ambulatory blood pressure measurement. A randomized controlled trial. Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Treatment of Hypertension Investigators. JAMA 1997;278(13):1065‐72. - PubMed
Tapolyai 2001
    1. Tapolyai M, Udvari‐Nagy S, Schede‐Don K. The rate of complications of 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is low. American Journal of Hypertension 2001;14(5):487‐8. - PubMed
Villar 1997
    1. Villar J, Bergsjo P. Scientific basis for the content of routine antenatal care. I. Philosophy, recent studies, and power to eliminate or alleviate adverse maternal outcomes. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1997;76(1):1‐14. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources