Joint teleconsultations (virtual outreach) versus standard outpatient appointments for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion: a randomised trial
- PMID: 12076550
- DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08828-1
Joint teleconsultations (virtual outreach) versus standard outpatient appointments for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion: a randomised trial
Abstract
Background: The current model of general practitioner referral of patients to hospital specialists in the UK is sometimes associated with unnecessary duplication of investigations and treatments. We aimed to compare joint teleconsultations between general practitioners, specialists, and patients (virtual outreach) with standard outpatient referral.
Methods: Virtual outreach services were established in London and Shrewsbury. The general practitioners referred 3170 patients, of whom 2094 consented to participate in the study and were eligible for inclusion. 1051 patients were randomly assigned virtual outreach, and 1043 standard outpatient appointments. We followed up the patients for 6 months after their index consultation. The primary outcome measure was the offer of a follow-up outpatient appointment. Analysis was by intention to treat.
Findings: More patients in the virtual outreach group than the standard group were offered a follow-up appointment (502 [52%] vs 400 [41%], odds ratio 1.52 [95% CI 1.27-1.82], p<0.0001). Significant differences in effects were observed between the two sites (p=0.009) and across different specialties (p<0.0001). Virtual outreach increased the offers of follow-up appointments more in Shrewsbury than in London, and more in ear, nose, and throat surgery and orthopaedics than in the other specialties. Fewer tests and investigations were ordered in the virtual outreach group by an average of 0.79 per patient (0.37-1.21, p=0.0002). Patients' satisfaction (analysed per protocol) was greater after a virtual outreach consultation than after a standard outpatient consultation (mean difference 0.33 scale points [95% CI 0.23-0.43], p<0.0001), with no heterogeneity between specialties or sites.
Interpretation: The trial showed that allocation of patients to virtual outreach consultations is variably associated with increased offers of follow-up appointments according to site and specialty, but leads to significant increases in patients' satisfaction and substantial reductions in tests and investigations. Efficient operation of such services will require appropriate selection of patients, significant service reorganisation, and provision of logistical support.
Comment in
-
Is there a future for telemedicine?Lancet. 2002 Jun 8;359(9322):1957-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08845-1. Lancet. 2002. PMID: 12076546 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Virtual outreach: a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of joint teleconferenced medical consultations.Health Technol Assess. 2004 Dec;8(50):1-106, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta8500. Health Technol Assess. 2004. PMID: 15546515 Review.
-
Virtual outreach: economic evaluation of joint teleconsultations for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion.BMJ. 2003 Jul 12;327(7406):84. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7406.84. BMJ. 2003. PMID: 12855528 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A national evaluation of specialists' clinics in primary care settings.Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Apr;51(465):264-9. Br J Gen Pract. 2001. PMID: 11458477 Free PMC article.
-
Design and performance of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of joint tele-consultations [ISRCTN54264250].BMC Fam Pract. 2002 Jan 11;3:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-3-1. Epub 2002 Jan 11. BMC Fam Pract. 2002. PMID: 11835692 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Patients' experience of teleconsultations in the UK.Br J Nurs. 2023 May 25;32(10):S24-S29. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2023.32.10.S24. Br J Nurs. 2023. PMID: 37219975
Cited by
-
An Assessment of the Potential Benefits of Video Consultation in the Emergency Department: Mixed Methods Study.Interact J Med Res. 2022 Sep 15;11(2):e36081. doi: 10.2196/36081. Interact J Med Res. 2022. PMID: 36107488 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of care for remote orthopaedic consultations using telemedicine: a randomised controlled trial.BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 8;16(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1717-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016. PMID: 27608768 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Concurrent validity of a patient self-administered examination and a clinical examination for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019 Oct 10;5(1):e000574. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000574. eCollection 2019. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019. PMID: 31673405 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Remote Orthopedic Consultations: Randomized Controlled Trial.J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 19;21(2):e11330. doi: 10.2196/11330. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 30777845 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Telehealth application in Sudan: requirements and potential benefits.Sudan J Paediatr. 2022;22(1):5-9. doi: 10.24911/SJP.106-1591278403. Sudan J Paediatr. 2022. PMID: 35958064 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical