Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Jul;51(1):65-9.
doi: 10.1136/gut.51.1.65.

Identification of objective pathological prognostic determinants and models of prognosis in Dukes' B colon cancer

Affiliations

Identification of objective pathological prognostic determinants and models of prognosis in Dukes' B colon cancer

V C Petersen et al. Gut. 2002 Jul.

Abstract

Background and aims: There is a need for objective easily determined pathological prognostic parameters in Dukes' B colon carcinoma to allow selection of such patients for further treatment as the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for these patients remains unclear. This study was initiated to assess the influence of pathological factors on prognosis in an unselected prospective series of Dukes' B colonic cancer.

Methods: The Gloucester Colorectal Cancer study, established in 1988, recruited more than 1000 cases. Meticulous pathological assessment of the 268 Dukes' B colonic cancer resections in this series included evaluation of all pathological factors that could influence staging and prognosis. All patients entered a comprehensive follow up system.

Results: Four pathologically determined factors--peritoneal involvement, venous spread (both submucosal and extramural), spread to involve a surgical margin, and perforation through the tumour-were independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. Combining these four factors into a simple cumulative scoring system generated clinically useful prognostic groups.

Conclusions: The cumulative prognostic index allows apportionment of patients with Dukes' B colon cancer into defined prognostic groups, which in turn could allow more objective selection of patients for adjuvant therapy, especially as part of clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier survival graph of low and high risk Dukes' B colonic cancer.

Comment in

  • A long hard look at Dukes' B.
    Williams GT. Williams GT. Gut. 2002 Jul;51(1):6-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.1.6. Gut. 2002. PMID: 12077080 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Dukes CE, Bussey HJR. The spread of rectal cancer and its effect on prognosis. Br J Cancer 1958;12:1016–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moertel CG, Fleming TR, Macdonald JS, et al. Levamisole and fluorouracil for adjuvant therapy of resected colon carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1990;322:352–8. - PubMed
    1. Moertel CG, Fleming TR, Macdonald JS, et al. Fluorouracil and levamisole as effective adjuvant therapy after resection of stage III colon carcinoma. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:321–6. - PubMed
    1. International Multicentre Pooled Analysis of B2 Colon Cancer Trials (IMPACT) Investigators. Efficacy of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid in colon cancer. Lancet 1995;345:939–44. - PubMed
    1. Dube S, Heyen F, Jenicek M. Adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal carcinoma: results of a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:35–41. - PubMed

Publication types