Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited
- PMID: 12077106
- PMCID: PMC1773259
- DOI: 10.1136/gut.51.1.130
Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited
Abstract
International consensus meetings in Padova and Vienna have attempted to rationalise the grading and classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia (GEN). With its minor adjustments, the Vienna classification of GEN seeks to be more closely in tune with patient management and it is hoped that it is not seen as fiddling around with terms but as a genuine contribution to patient care.
Comment in
-
Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.Gut. 2003 Mar;52(3):455-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.3.455-a. Gut. 2003. PMID: 12584237 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
[The World Health Organization and the Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia].Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2005 Aug;34(8):540-1. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2005. PMID: 16383305 Chinese. No abstract available.
-
The new Vienna classification of epithelial neoplasia of the gastrointestinal tract: advantages and disadvantages.Virchows Arch. 2003 Feb;442(2):99-106. doi: 10.1007/s00428-002-0680-3. Epub 2002 Dec 13. Virchows Arch. 2003. PMID: 12596058 Review.
-
Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.Gut. 2003 Mar;52(3):455-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.3.455-a. Gut. 2003. PMID: 12584237 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.Gut. 2000 Aug;47(2):251-5. doi: 10.1136/gut.47.2.251. Gut. 2000. PMID: 10896917 Free PMC article.
-
Review of histological classifications of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: differences in diagnosis of early carcinomas between Japanese and Western pathologists.J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jul;36(7):445-56. doi: 10.1007/s005350170067. J Gastroenterol. 2001. PMID: 11480788 Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic Ability of Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging for the Extent of Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2021 Apr 23;2021:5543556. doi: 10.1155/2021/5543556. eCollection 2021. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2021. PMID: 33986796 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic Usefulness of p53 Immunostaining in Gastric Cancer and Dysplasia: A Real-world Clinical Experience.In Vivo. 2024 Jul-Aug;38(4):1865-1874. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13641. In Vivo. 2024. PMID: 38936896 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic limitations of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging in early gastric cancer.Endosc Int Open. 2020 Oct;8(10):E1233-E1242. doi: 10.1055/a-1220-6389. Epub 2020 Sep 21. Endosc Int Open. 2020. PMID: 33015324 Free PMC article.
-
Low Discrepancy Between Tissue Biopsy Plus Magnifying Endoscopy With Narrow-Band Imaging and Endoscopic Resection in the Diagnosis of Gastric Epithelial Neoplasia (STROBE).Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(27):e1092. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001092. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015. PMID: 26166094 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical features of negative pathologic results after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1163-1171. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5086-4. Epub 2016 Jul 12. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 27405480
References
-
- Rugge M, Correa P, Dixon MF, et al. Gastric dysplasia: The Padova International Classification. Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:167–76. - PubMed
-
- Foucar E, Foucar MK. Classification in pathology. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;115 (special article http:///www.ajcp.com).
-
- Schlemper RJ, Kato Y, Stolte M. Review of histological classifications of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: differences in diagnosis of early carcinomas between Japanese and Western pathologists. J Gastroenterol 2001;36:445–56. - PubMed
-
- Schlemper RJ, Itabashi M, Kato Y, et al. Differences in diagnostic criteria for gastric carcinoma between Japanese and Western pathologists. Lancet 1997;349:1725–9. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical