Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 Jul;37(7):1024-6.
doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.33834.

Management of congenital esophageal stenosis

Affiliations
Review

Management of congenital esophageal stenosis

Sanjeev A Vasudevan et al. J Pediatr Surg. 2002 Jul.

Abstract

Background/purpose: The authors report the incidence, diagnosis, and treatment methods of congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) at their institution.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 123 patients with tracheoesophageal anomalies in a pediatric hospital between 1980 and 1999 was performed. Charts were reviewed for patient demographics, presence of true CES, associated congenital anomalies, method of diagnosis, methods of treatment, and histopathology.

Results: Six of the 123 patients (4.9%) had true CES (one patient had 2 separate stenoses). Two patients had isolated CES, one patient had CES with isolated tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), one patient had CES with isolated esophageal atresia (EA), and 2 patients had CES with EA/TEF. Diagnoses were made with an upper gastrointestinal (GI) contrast study in 5 patients, and one patient had one of 2 stenoses diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound and the other diagnosed intraoperatively. Four of the 7 stenoses were treated with surgical resection, and the remainder was treated with esophageal dilatation. Histopathology from the 4 resected stenoses showed tracheobronchial remnants in 3 specimens and submucosal thickening in 1 specimen.

Conclusions: Although isolated CES is rare (2 of 123 = 1.6%), CES associated with other tracheoesophageal anomalies has a higher incidence (4 of 123 = 3.25%). Patients with this lesion should be treated first with dilatation. If ineffective, resection is required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources