Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic lymph node staging in esophageal cancer: do clinicopathological factors affect the outcome?
- PMID: 12078757
- DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03552-x
Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic lymph node staging in esophageal cancer: do clinicopathological factors affect the outcome?
Abstract
Background: This study was performed to evaluate the pattern of lymphatic metastases found by combined thoracoscopic (TS) and laparoscopic (LS) lymph node staging in esophageal cancer, and ascertain whether clinicopathologic factors may be used to guide the clinical practice of combined TS and LS staging.
Methods: A retrospective study was performed in a series of 76 esophageal cancer patients who had undergone both TS and LS staging before treatment. The correlation of TS and LS lymph node metastases with clinicopathologic factors was analyzed, including the clinical T stage, clinical N stage, tumor location, and histology.
Results: Thirty-one patients (40.8%) were found to have lymphatic metastasis by TS and LS staging. Among them, 22 patients had abdominal lymph node metastases, 7 patients had mediastinal lymph node metastases, and 2 patients had both. Patients with advanced T stage (T3 to T4) or adenocarcinoma had a higher frequency of abdominal lymphatic metastases than patients with early T stage (T1 to T2) (39% vs 16%; p = 0.04) or squamous cell carcinoma (39% vs 20%; p = 0.079), respectively. Patients with clinical abdominal N1 stage had a higher incidence of positive laparoscopic finding than patients with clinical abdominal N0 stage (67% vs 23%; p = 0.001). There was no significant correlation between lymphatic metastases and the location of the primary tumor.
Conclusions: Clinicopathologic factors, including the histologic type, the clinical T stage, and abdominal N stage, may affect the outcome of TS and LS lymph node staging in esophageal cancer patients. This clinicopathologic impact may play a role for the selection of candidates for TS and LS staging, and also allows surgeons to focus their attention on the most likely high-yield biopsy targets.
Similar articles
-
Thoracoscopy/laparoscopy in the staging of esophageal cancer: Maryland experience.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002 Aug;12(4):213-8. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200208000-00002. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002. PMID: 12193812
-
Minimally invasive surgical staging is superior to endoscopic ultrasound in detecting lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Nov;114(5):817-21; discussion 821-3. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70086-2. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997. PMID: 9375612
-
CALGB 9380: a prospective trial of the feasibility of thoracoscopy/laparoscopy in staging esophageal cancer.Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Apr;71(4):1073-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02680-1. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001. PMID: 11308139 Clinical Trial.
-
Advances in staging of esophageal carcinoma.Chest. 1998 Jan;113(1 Suppl):107S-111S. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.1_supplement.107s. Chest. 1998. PMID: 9438699 Review.
-
Role of thoracoscopic lymph node staging for lung and esophageal cancer.Oncology (Williston Park). 1996 Jun;10(6):793-802; discussion 804, 813-4. Oncology (Williston Park). 1996. PMID: 8823795 Review.
Cited by
-
Preoperative TN staging of esophageal cancer: comparison of miniprobe ultrasonography, spiral CT and MRI.World J Gastroenterol. 2003 Feb;9(2):219-24. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i2.219. World J Gastroenterol. 2003. PMID: 12532435 Free PMC article.
-
Detection and staging of esophageal cancers.Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2004 Jul;20(4):381-5. doi: 10.1097/00001574-200407000-00014. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2004. PMID: 15703669 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical