Similar articles

• Comparison of arcuate-legged clipped versus sutured hepatic artery, portal vein, and bile duct anastomoses.

  Geevarghese SK, Bradley AL, Atkinson J, Wright JK, Chapman WC, Van Buren DH, Blair KT, Hutchins CH, Jabbour K, Phillips J, Williams PE, Pinson CW. Geevarghese SK, et al. Am Surg. 1999 Apr;65(4):311-6. Am Surg. 1999. PMID: 10190352
• A comparison of para-anastomotic compliance profiles after vascular anastomosis: nonpenetrating clips versus standard sutures.

  Baguneid MS, Goldner S, Fulford PE, Hamilton G, Walker MG, Seifalian AM. Baguneid MS, et al. J Vasc Surg. 2001 Apr;33(4):812-20. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.112806. J Vasc Surg. 2001. PMID: 11296337
• Vascular closure system type of nonpenetrating arcuate-legged titanium clips for graft-artery and graft-graft anastomoses: review of our clinical experience.

  Inoue Y, Kubota T, Jibiki M, Hirokawa M, Sugano N, Iwai T. Inoue Y, et al. Surg Today. 2004;34(3):231-6. doi: 10.1007/s00595-003-2696-y. Surg Today. 2004. PMID: 14999535
• Five years' world experience with nonpenetrating clips for vascular anastomoses.

  Zeebregts CJ, Kirsch WM, van den Dungen JJ, Zhu YH, van Schilfgaarde R. Zeebregts CJ, et al. Am J Surg. 2004 Jun;187(6):751-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.08.028. Am J Surg. 2004. PMID: 15191871 Review.
• [Scanning electron microscopy of native preparations of vascular endothelium].

  Karaganov IaL, Mironov AA, Mironov VA. Karaganov IaL, et al. Arkh Anat Gistol Embriol. 1986 Jan;90(1):93-105. Arkh Anat Gistol Embriol. 1986. PMID: 3513739 Review. Russian. No abstract available.