Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Jul;73(1):21-8.
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.73.1.21.

Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy

S G Patel  1 , D A Collie, J M Wardlaw, S C Lewis, A R Wright, R J Gibson, R J Sellar
Affiliations

Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy

S G Patel et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of routinely available non-invasive tests (spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA), time of flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and colour Doppler ultrasound (DUS)), individually and together, compared with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with symptomatic tight carotid stenosis; and to assess the effect of substituting non-invasive tests for DSA on outcome, interobserver variability, and patient preference.

Methods: Patients referred from a neurovascular clinic were subjected prospectively to DUS imaging. The operator was blind to symptoms. Patients with a tight carotid stenosis on the symptomatic side were admitted for DSA. CTA and MRA were performed during the admission. The CTA, MRA, and DSA films were each read independently by two of six experienced radiologists, blind to all other data.

Results: 67 patients were included (34 had all four imaging procedures). DUS, CTA, and MRA all agreed with DSA in the diagnosis of operable v non-operable disease in about 80% of patients. CTA tended to underestimate (sensitivity 0.65, specificity 1.0), MRA to overestimate (sensitivity 1.0, specificity 0.57), and DUS to agree most closely with (sensitivity 0.85, specificity 0.71) the degree of stenosis as shown by DSA. When using any two of the three non-invasive tests in combination, adding the third if the first two disagreed would result in very few misdiagnoses (about 6%). MRA had similar interobserver variability to CTA (both worse than DSA). Patients preferred CTA over MRA and DSA.

Conclusions: DUS, CTA, and MRA all show similar accuracy in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis. No technique on its own is accurate enough to replace DSA. Two non-invasive techniques in combination, and adding a third if the first two disagree, appears more accurate, but may still result in diagnostic errors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Measuring carotid stenosis.
    Young G, Humphrey P. Young G, et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;74(1):140; author reply 140-1. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.1.140. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003. PMID: 12486292 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Ann Intern Med. 1995 Mar 1;122(5):360-7 - PubMed
    1. Stroke. 2000 Jun;31(6):1444-50 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Ultrasound. 2000 Dec;12(2):137-43 - PubMed
    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Sep;56(9):967-72 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1994 Oct;193(1):219-26 - PubMed