Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Jun 25;99(13):8518-23.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.142288399.

The rate-limiting step in the folding of a large ribozyme without kinetic traps

Affiliations

The rate-limiting step in the folding of a large ribozyme without kinetic traps

X-W Fang et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

A fundamental question in RNA folding is the nature of the rate-limiting step. Folding of large RNAs often is trapped by the need to undo misfolded structures, which precludes the study of the other, potentially more interesting aspects in the rate-limiting step, such as conformational search, metal ion binding, and the role of productive intermediates. The catalytic domain of the Bacillus subtilis RNase P RNA folds without a kinetic trap, thereby providing an ideal system to elucidate these steps. We analyzed the folding kinetics by using fluorescence and absorbance spectroscopies, catalytic activity, and synchrotron small-angle x-ray scattering. Folding begins with the rapid formation of early intermediates wherein the majority of conformational search occurs, followed by the slower formation of subsequent intermediates. Before the rate-limiting step, more than 98% of the total structure has formed. The rate-limiting step is a small-scale structural rearrangement involving prebound metal ions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) The B. subtilis C-domain (47). A fluorescein is covalently attached to the 5′ end that allows monitoring the folding kinetics by fluorescence spectroscopy. (B) Folding kinetics at 10°C starting from either the Uaq state (20 mM Tris⋅HCl, no Me2+) or the Uurea state (20 mM Tris⋅HCl, 8 M urea, 1 mM EDTA, no Me2+). Folding is monitored by absorbance from 0.002 to 0.2 s, and the dead-time change in signal is indicated with dashed arrows. Folding is monitored by fluorescence between 0.2 to 360 s. The fluorescence signal is fit with a two-exponential function. The slow phase has the same rate as that obtained by catalytic activity (open circles, right axis) and directly reports the rate-limiting step. The fast phase corresponds to the signal change of the Ieq-to-Iformula image transition and is ≈6 times faster than the slow phase.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Metal-ion chevron analysis using fluorescence spectroscopy (Upper). In the chevron analysis, rate saturation at the high or low [Me2+] indicates the formation of a folding and unfolding intermediate, Iformula image and Iformula image, respectively. [Me2+] at the vertex of the chevron is approximately the same as the midpoint of the equilibrium Ieq-to-N transition measured independently (Lower). (B) Folding kinetics of C-domain from Ieq at 10 mM MgCl2, 10°C, monitored by SAXS. The percentage of compaction is calculated from radius gyration. This result indicates that Iformula image is highly compact and forms quickly.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Temperature dependence of the folding rate. (B) Correlation between the activation enthalpy for folding and the dehydration of the metal ions measured by NMR (36).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Summary of C-domain folding. The rate-limiting step is shown in red. The folding half-lives at 10°C are shown, in seconds, above the arrows. The starting point is the Uurea state (C domain in 8 M urea and 1 mM EDTA), which has little RNA structure. Ieq contains the native amount of secondary structure and some tertiary structure. Iformula image contains >98% of the native structure. In less than 1 ms, the majority of the conformational search occurs with the formation of Ieq. All folding half-lives are measured in this work. Percent compaction is calculated from the data shown in Fig. 2B and from our previous work (31). Percent m-value change is calculated from published data (15).

References

    1. Cole P E, Crothers D M. Biochemistry. 1972;11:4368–4374. - PubMed
    1. Webb P K, Fresco J R. J Mol Biol. 1973;74:387–402. - PubMed
    1. Lynch D C, Schimmel P R. Biochemistry. 1974;13:1841–1852. - PubMed
    1. Zarrinkar P P, Williamson J R. Science. 1994;265:918–924. - PubMed
    1. Banerjee A R, Turner D H. Biochemistry. 1995;34:6504–6512. - PubMed

Publication types