Swelling and trismus after third molar removal. A comparison of two techniques

Comparative Study

C Yates et al. Int J Oral Surg. 1979 Oct.

. 1979 Oct;8(5):347-8.

doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(79)80062-9.

Abstract

The linqual split technique is associated with less external swelling than a method of mandibular third molar removal confined to a buccal approach.

Postoperative swelling and trismus after mandibular third molar removal with the lingual split bone technique.
Rood JP, Yates C, Buchanan M. Rood JP, et al. Int J Oral Surg. 1979 Feb;8(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(79)80036-8. Int J Oral Surg. 1979. PMID: 107132
Modified lingual split technique versus conventional buccal technique in odontectomy of impacted mandibular third molars.
Hindy AM, Ismaiel ME, Fayed N. Hindy AM, et al. Egypt Dent J. 1995 Apr;41(2):1137-44. Egypt Dent J. 1995. PMID: 9497650 Clinical Trial.
The interrelation of postoperative complaints after removal of the mandibular third molar.
Ten Bosch JJ, van Gool AV. Ten Bosch JJ, et al. Int J Oral Surg. 1977 Feb;6(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(77)80068-9. Int J Oral Surg. 1977. PMID: 402319
Is bromelain effective in controlling the inflammatory parameters of pain, edema, and trismus after lower third molar surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Souza GM, Fernandes IA, Dos Santos CRR, Falci SGM. de Souza GM, et al. Phytother Res. 2019 Mar;33(3):473-481. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6244. Epub 2018 Nov 28. Phytother Res. 2019. PMID: 30484910
Rapid, early-onset group a streptococcus infection after impacted third molar removal: a review and case series.
Leavitt BD, Van Ess JM. Leavitt BD, et al. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;70(12):2742-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.07.045. Epub 2012 Sep 22. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 23010371 Review. No abstract available.