Similar articles

• A protocol review guide to reduce IRB inconsistency.

  Prentice ED, Antonson DL. Prentice ED, et al. IRB. 1987 Jan-Feb;9(1):9-11. IRB. 1987. PMID: 11649892 No abstract available.
• Institutional review boards as an instrument of assessment: research involving human subjects in the U.S.

  Gray BH. Gray BH. Sci Technol Human Values. 1978 Fall;(25). Sci Technol Human Values. 1978. PMID: 11663042 No abstract available.
• Xenografts and scientific evaluation.

  Tucker WR. Tucker WR. IRB. 1986 Mar-Apr;8(2):10. IRB. 1986. PMID: 11649749 No abstract available.
• A relational ethical dialogue with research ethics committees.

  Larkin PJ, de Casterlé BD, Schotsmans P. Larkin PJ, et al. Nurs Ethics. 2008 Mar;15(2):234-42. doi: 10.1177/0969733007086021. Nurs Ethics. 2008. PMID: 18272613 Review.
• Research on the profession of nursing. Ethical inquiry.

  Gortner SR. Gortner SR. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 1985;3:193-214. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 1985. PMID: 3893476 Review. No abstract available.