A comparison of the discriminative stimulus properties of R-2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (R-DOM) and S-amphetamine in the rat
- PMID: 1208758
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00428898
A comparison of the discriminative stimulus properties of R-2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (R-DOM) and S-amphetamine in the rat
Abstract
The effects of 0.75 mg/kg of R-DOM and 1.0 mg/kg of S-amphetamine served as discriminative stimuli in the control of a two-lever discrimination response. Dose-response evaluation of the two agents indicated that in S-amphetamine-trained animals the drug effects produced by test doses of 0.5 to 2.2 mg/kg of S-amphetamine could be considered as a dose-dependent continuum of low to high stimulus intensity. In R-DOM trained subjects, low to moderate doses of R-DOM (0.5-1.5 mg/kg) produced dose-related discriminative responding, but the high dose of R-DOM (2.2 mg/kg) resulted in random responding. When animals trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of S-amphetamine from saline were given 0.5 or 0.75 mg/kg of R-DOM, they tended to respond on the drug correct lever. However, higher doses of R-DOM (1.5 and 2.2 mg/kg) produced random responding. Similarly, animals trained to discriminate 0.75 mg/kg of R-DOM from saline exhibited correct responses following 0.5 and 0.75 mg/kg of S-amphetamine, but not after 1.5 and 2.2 mg/kg. These data suggest that low doses of R-DOM produce discriminative stimuli that are qualitatively different from those of higher doses. Stimuli following low doses of R-DOM also appear similar in some respects to those following low doses of S-amphetamine.
Similar articles
-
The discriminative stimulus properties of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM): differentiation from amphetamine.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;68(3):209-15. doi: 10.1007/BF00428105. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980. PMID: 6771804
-
The effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine (DOET), d-amphetamine, and cocaine in rats trained with mescaline as a discriminative stimulus.Psychopharmacologia. 1975 Oct 14;44(1):29-32. doi: 10.1007/BF00421179. Psychopharmacologia. 1975. PMID: 1197576
-
1-(2,3-Methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (2,3-MDA): a preliminary investigation.Gen Pharmacol. 1984;15(4):361-2. doi: 10.1016/0306-3623(84)90016-8. Gen Pharmacol. 1984. PMID: 6149169
-
Discriminative stimulus properties of MDA analogs.Biol Psychiatry. 1982 Jul;17(7):807-14. Biol Psychiatry. 1982. PMID: 6126227
-
Further investigation of the discriminative stimulus properties of MDA.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984 Apr;20(4):501-5. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(84)90295-8. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984. PMID: 6728867
Cited by
-
The time-dependent stimulus effects of R(-)-2,5-dimethoxy-4-methamphetamine (DOM): implications for drug-induced stimulus control as a method for the study of hallucinogenic agents.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995 May;119(2):239-45. doi: 10.1007/BF02246166. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995. PMID: 7659772
-
The discriminative stimulus properties of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM): differentiation from amphetamine.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;68(3):209-15. doi: 10.1007/BF00428105. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980. PMID: 6771804
-
MDA and DOM: substituted amphetamines that do not produce amphetamine-like discriminative stimuli in the rat.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;67(3):311-2. doi: 10.1007/BF00431274. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980. PMID: 6770411
-
Behavioral and neuropharmacological analysis of amphetamine and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine in rats.Psychopharmacologia. 1975 Nov 21;44(3):229-39. doi: 10.1007/BF00428899. Psychopharmacologia. 1975. PMID: 1208759