Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Jul;95(7):343-7.
doi: 10.1177/014107680209500706.

Effect of breaking bad news on patients' perceptions of doctors

Affiliations

Effect of breaking bad news on patients' perceptions of doctors

Mandy M Barnett. J R Soc Med. 2002 Jul.

Abstract

The breaking of bad news is a routine but difficult task for many health professionals. There are numerous anecdotes of insensitive practice but the subject has attracted little systematic research. We therefore interviewed 106 patients with advanced cancer (from an original sample of 195) to assess their perceptions of the doctors involved in their care. Aspects of the 'breaking bad news' event were recorded during discussion of the illness history and were subsequently rated. Participants were also asked to nominate doctors under the headings 'most helpful' and 'less helpful', and completed standardized psychological screening questionnaires. In 94 of the 106 cases the bad news had been given by a doctor, usually a surgeon. Of the 13 doctors categorized as 'most helpful' when breaking bad news, 8 were general practitioners; of the 7 categorized as 'less helpful' all were surgeons. 69% of patients were neutral or positive about the bad-news consultation, but 20% were negative and 6% very negative. Doctors in surgical specialties were significantly more likely to be rated poorly than non-surgical specialists or general practitioners. Surgeons were the group of doctors most likely to break bad news, but non-surgical doctors were rated more positively in performance of the task. This finding has implications for training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Breaking bad news.
    Patterson M. Patterson M. J R Soc Med. 2002 Oct;95(10):526. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.95.10.526-a. J R Soc Med. 2002. PMID: 12356984 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Ptacek JT, Elserhardt T. Breaking bad news: a review of the literature. JAMA 1996;276: 496-502 - PubMed
    1. Sykes N. Medical students' fears about breaking bad news. Lancet 1989;iii: 564 - PubMed
    1. Burton MV, Parker RW. Psychological aspects of cancer surgery: surgeons' attitudes and opinions. Psycho-Oncology 1997;6: 47-64 - PubMed
    1. Girgis A, Sanson-Fisher RW, McCarthy WH. Communicating with patients: surgeons' perceptions of their skills and need for training. Aust N Z J Surg 1997;67: 775-80 - PubMed
    1. Ford S, Fallowfield L, Lewis S. Can oncologists detect distress in their outpatients and how satisfied are they with their performance during bad news consultations? Br J Cancer 1994;66: 767-70 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types