A randomized, double blind, dose-response comparison of balsalazide (6.75 g), balsalazide (2.25 g), and mesalamine (2.4 g) in the treatment of active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis
- PMID: 12094857
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05781.x
A randomized, double blind, dose-response comparison of balsalazide (6.75 g), balsalazide (2.25 g), and mesalamine (2.4 g) in the treatment of active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis
Abstract
Objective: Balsalazide is a new innovative, mesalamine-containing prodrug that is activated by bacteria in the colon. Balsalazide has been shown previously to be well tolerated and effective in the treatment of acute ulcerative colitis. The aim of this study was to determine the dose-response of balsalazide for efficacy and safety in active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis and to compare this profile with that of mesalamine, pH-dependent, delayed-release tablets.
Methods: A multicenter, randomized, active control, double-blind, double-dummy, dose-response, parallel-group study was performed comparing balsalazide (6.75 g daily), balsalazide (2.25 g daily), and mesalamine (2.4 g daily), administered for 8 wk to 154 patients with active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis as verified by sigmoidoscopy.
Results: Eight weeks of treatment with 6.75 g of balsalazide daily provided significantly greater improvement than did balsalazide (2.25 g daily) in rectal bleeding (64.7% [6.75-g balsalazide] vs 32.4% [2.25-g balsalazide], p < 0.006), stool frequency (58.8% vs 29.4%, p < 0.006), sigmoidoscopic score (78.9% vs 52.5%, p < 0.015), and Physician's Global Assessment (73.7% vs 51.3%, p < 0.03). The efficacy of balsalazide showed a significantly more rapid onset of action than that of mesalamine (2.4 g daily) (2-wk sigmoidocopic score improvement, 54.7% [6.75-g balsalazide] vs 29.4% [2.4-g mesalamine], p = 0.006) with numerically greater improvement at 8 wk in five of seven measured signs and symptoms. Balsalazide (6.75 g daily) was well tolerated, and the safety profile did not differ significantly from that of balsalazide (2.25 g daily) or mesalamine.
Conclusions: Eight weeks of treatment with balsalazide (6.75 g daily) is significantly more effective than balsalazide (2.25 g daily) and more rapid in onset than mesalamine (2.4 g daily) in improving signs and symptoms of acute ulcerative colitis. Balsalazide (6.75 g daily) is well tolerated, and the safety profile does not differ from that of balsalazide (2.25 g daily) and mesalamine (2.4 g daily).
Comment in
-
Equimolar doses of balsalazide and mesalamine: are we comparing apples and oranges?Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jun;97(6):1283-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05763.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002. PMID: 12094839 Review. No abstract available.
-
Caution in the interpretation of safety and efficacy differences in clinical trials comparing aminosalicylates for ulcerative colitis.Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jan;98(1):215-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07205.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003. PMID: 12526968 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Balsalazide is superior to mesalamine in the time to improvement of signs and symptoms of acute mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis.Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Dec;97(12):3078-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07103.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002. PMID: 12492193 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and efficacy of a new 3.3 g b.i.d. tablet formulation in patients with mild-to-moderately-active ulcerative colitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jun;104(6):1452-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.83. Epub 2009 Apr 21. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009. PMID: 19491859 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of once- or twice-daily MMX mesalamine (SPD476) for the induction of remission of mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jan;5(1):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.10.025. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007. PMID: 17234558 Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of ulcerative colitis with oral mesalamine: advances in drug formulation, efficacy expectations and dose response, compliance, and chemoprevention.Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2006 Spring;6(2):97-105. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2006. PMID: 16699478 Review.
-
Equimolar doses of balsalazide and mesalamine: are we comparing apples and oranges?Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jun;97(6):1283-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05763.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002. PMID: 12094839 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Stopping 5-aminosalicylates in patients with ulcerative colitis starting biologic therapy does not increase the risk of adverse clinical outcomes: analysis of two nationwide population-based cohorts.Gut. 2019 Jun;68(6):977-984. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317021. Epub 2018 Nov 12. Gut. 2019. PMID: 30420398 Free PMC article.
-
Role of procalcitonin in infectious gastroenteritis and inflammatory bowel disease.Dig Dis Sci. 2008 Nov;53(11):2960-8. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0254-6. Epub 2008 Apr 16. Dig Dis Sci. 2008. PMID: 18415679
-
Comparison of mesalazine and balsalazide in induction and maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis.Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Apr;54(4):712-21. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0428-2. Epub 2008 Aug 6. Dig Dis Sci. 2009. PMID: 18683049 Review.
-
Advances in refractory ulcerative colitis treatment: A new therapeutic target, Annexin A2.World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 7;21(29):8776-86. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i29.8776. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26269667 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcome measurement in clinical trials for Ulcerative Colitis: towards standardisation.Trials. 2007 Jun 25;8:17. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-17. Trials. 2007. PMID: 17592647 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical