Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002 Apr;89(4):385-9.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf056.

Consequences of stoichiometric error on nuclear DNA content evaluation in Coffea liberica var. dewevrei using DAPI and propidium iodide

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Consequences of stoichiometric error on nuclear DNA content evaluation in Coffea liberica var. dewevrei using DAPI and propidium iodide

Michel Noirot et al. Ann Bot. 2002 Apr.

Abstract

The genome size of coffee trees (Coffea sp.) was assessed using flow cytometry. Nuclear DNA was stained with two dyes [4',6-diamino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride hydrate (DAPI) and propidium iodide (PI)]. Fluorescence in coffee tree nuclei (C-PI or C-DAPI) was compared with that of the standard, petunia (P-PI or P-DAPI). If there is no stoichiometric error, then the ratio between fluorescence of the target nuclei and that of the standard nuclei (R-PI or R-DAPI) is expected to be proportional to the genome size. Between-tree differences in target : standard fluorescence ratios were noted in Coffea liberica var. dewevrei using propidium iodide and DAPI. For both dyes, between-tree differences were due to a lack of proportionality when comparing locations of the coffee peak and the petunia peak. Intraspecific genome size variations clearly cannot explain variations in the target : standard fluorescence ratio. The origin of the lack of proportionality between target and standard fluorescences differed for the two dyes. With propidium iodide, there was a regression line convergence point, and no between-tree differences were noted in this respect, whereas there was no such convergence with DAPI. An accurate estimate of genome size can thus be obtained with PI. Implications with respect to accessibility and binding mode are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Fig. 1. Within‐tree relationships comparing the standard peak location (P‐PI) and the coffee peak location (C‐PI). Each symbol represents one tree.
None
Fig. 2. Relationship between slopes and intersects for within‐tree linear regressions intersecting at one point (450·3; 894·8).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. ArumuganathanK, Earle ED.1991. Estimation of nuclear DNA content of plants by flow cytometry. Plant Molecular Biology Report 9: 229–233.
    1. BarreP, Noirot M, Louarn J, Duperray C, Hamon S.1996. Reliable flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content in coffee trees. Cytometry 24: 32–38. - PubMed
    1. BennettMD, Smith JB.1976. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 274: 227–274. - PubMed
    1. BennettMD, Leitch IJ.1995. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Annals of Botany 76: 113–176.
    1. BiradarDP, Rayburn AL.1994. Flow cytometric probing of chromatin condensation in maize diploid nuclei. New Phytologist 126: 31–35.

Publication types