This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Editorial

. 2002 Jul;16(4):461-2.

doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700102.

Why are we so bad at treating amblyopia?

R Gregson¹

Affiliations

PMID: 12101454
DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700102

Editorial

Why are we so bad at treating amblyopia?

R Gregson. Eye (Lond). 2002 Jul.

. 2002 Jul;16(4):461-2.

doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700102.

Author

R Gregson¹

Affiliation

¹ Royal College of Ophthalmologists, 17 Cornwall Terrace Regent's Park London NW1 4QW, UK. Richard.Gregson@mail.qmcuh-tr-trent

PMID: 12101454
DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700102

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Why are we so bad at treating amblyopia?
Dadeya S. Dadeya S. Eye (Lond). 2004 Apr;18(4):449. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700613. Eye (Lond). 2004. PMID: 15069454 No abstract available.
Preschool vision filtering and amblyopia.
Mowatt L, Mac Farlane C, Robinson R. Mowatt L, et al. Eye (Lond). 2005 May;19(5):589; author reply 589-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701507. Eye (Lond). 2005. PMID: 15818393 No abstract available.

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Nature Publishing Group
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information
Research Materials
- NCI CPTC Antibody Characterization Program