Prospective randomised double-masked trial of bilateral multifocal, bifocal or monofocal intraocular lenses
- PMID: 12101459
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700077
Prospective randomised double-masked trial of bilateral multifocal, bifocal or monofocal intraocular lenses
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate the functional effect of bilateral implantation of two different multifocal intraocular lenses (IOL) compared with the standard monofocal IOL.
Methods: Sixty-nine patients were recruited into a prospective, double-masked, randomised, controlled trial at a single hospital in the United Kingdom. Sixty completed follow-up; 16 implanted with monofocal IOLs, 29 with AMO 'ARRAY' multifocal IOLs and 15 with Storz 'TRUEVISTA' bifocal IOLs. Phacoemulsification and IOL implantation was performed to a standardised technique in both eyes within a 2-month period. The main outcome measures were distance and near visual acuity, depth of field and validated assessment of subjective function (TyPE questionnaire).
Results: naided distance acuity was good, and equivalent across the three groups. Corrected distance acuity was significantly lower in the bifocal group. Patients with multifocal and bifocal IOLs could read smaller absolute print size than those in the monofocal group (P = 0.05), but at a closer reading distance such that mean unaided near acuity was equal in the three groups. Corrected near acuity was significantly higher in the monofocal control group (P < 0.05). Depth of field was increased in multifocal (P = 0.06) and bifocal (P = 0.004) groups. Overall visual satisfaction was equal in the three groups, while near visual satisfaction was higher in the multifocal group than the monofocal (P = 0.04). Spectacle independence was not seen in the monofocal group, but was achieved in 28% of multifocal IOL patients and 33% of bifocal patients (P < 0.001). Adverse symptoms such as glare and haloes were significantly more bothersome with multifocal (not bifocal) IOLs than monofocals (P = 0.01).
Conclusions: Multifocal and bifocal IOLs improved unaided near vision performance, with around one in three patients becoming spectacle-independent. The main adverse effect was an increased incidence of subjective glare and haloes in the multifocal IOL group.
Similar articles
-
One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.Ophthalmology. 2008 Sep;115(9):1508-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.017. Epub 2008 Jun 5. Ophthalmology. 2008. PMID: 18538402 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses: a randomized trial.Ophthalmology. 2008 Jun;115(6):993-1001.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.042. Epub 2007 Nov 26. Ophthalmology. 2008. PMID: 18031818 Clinical Trial.
-
Quality of vision after AMO Array multifocal intraocular lens implantation.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Dec;30(12):2483-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.04.049. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004. PMID: 15617914 Clinical Trial.
-
[Multifocal intraocular lenses--an assessment of current status].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1993 Jul;203(1):19-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1045645. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1993. PMID: 8411889 Review. German.
-
Multifocal intraocular lenses.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1996 Feb;7(1):2-10. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1996. PMID: 10160430 Review.
Cited by
-
Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: Through Focus Evaluation of Wavefront-Shaping versus Diffractive Optics.Biomed Hub. 2023 Feb 28;8(1):25-30. doi: 10.1159/000529234. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Biomed Hub. 2023. PMID: 36938365 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Optical Quality at Different Contrast Levels in Pseudophakic Eyes.J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:4247973. doi: 10.1155/2016/4247973. Epub 2016 Jan 28. J Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27057349 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery and lens replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 May;257(5):863-875. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-04218-6. Epub 2019 Jan 10. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 30627791
-
Potential of the 1 CU accommodative intraocular lens.Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Oct;89(10):1289-92. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.068056. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005. PMID: 16170118 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical outcomes of a new diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 18;10(12):1844-1850. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.12.09. eCollection 2017. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 29259902 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources