[Do mobile telephones have adverse effects on the functions of implantable cardioverter defibrillators?]
- PMID: 12101794
[Do mobile telephones have adverse effects on the functions of implantable cardioverter defibrillators?]
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of widely used mobile telephones on the functions of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD).
Methods: The study included 9 patients (2 women, 7 men, mean age 65.5 +/- 6) with coronary artery disease who had underwent transvenous ICD implantation due to sustained ventricular tachycardia and/or fibrillation. First the test was performed on the basal conditions of ICD. Then, spontaneous heart rate of the patient was programmed to 10 beats/minute on VVI mode and the test was repeated. Two mobile telephones were located symmetrically 50 cm, 30 cm, 20 cm and 10 cm away from the ICD pocket in the pectoralis muscle and finally the mobile telephones antennas were touched to the pockets. On these different distances, the test was repeated during opening, standby, calling, talking and closing of the telephones. Possible ICD dysfunctions such as improper antitachycardic shock, inhibition of pacemaker functions, conversion to ventricular asynchronous mode (VOO) and development of ventricular trigger in devices with two chamber pacemaker functions were tested. The changes were observed on intracardiac and surface ECG's.
Results: There were no changes in the basal and pacemaker functions of ICD's and no symptoms in any patients.
Conclusion: We have concluded that mobile telephones have no adverse effects on the functions of types of ICD assessed in the study.
Comment in
-
[Editorial comment: mobile telephones and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators].Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2002 Mar;2(1):49. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2002. PMID: 12793432 Turkish. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
In-vivo testing of digital cellular telephones in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.Eur Heart J. 2001 Aug;22(15):1337-42. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2516. Eur Heart J. 2001. PMID: 11465966
-
[Editorial comment: mobile telephones and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators].Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2002 Mar;2(1):49. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2002. PMID: 12793432 Turkish. No abstract available.
-
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cellular telephones: is there any interference?Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Jul;22(7):983-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00561.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999. PMID: 10456625
-
Electromagnetic compatibility of electronic implants--review of the literature.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2001 Dec 17;113(23-24):903-14. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2001. PMID: 11802505 Review.
-
[Is there any risk interaction between electromagnetic field generated by mobile phones and artificial pacemakers].Med Pr. 2001;52(2):107-10. Med Pr. 2001. PMID: 11761658 Review. Polish.
Cited by
-
Interference between cellular telephones and implantable rhythm devices: a review on recent papers.Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2006 Oct 1;6(4):226-33. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2006. PMID: 17031411 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical