Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 12103284
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09312-1
Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Trauma to the perineum is a serious and frequent problem after childbirth, with about 350000 women each year in the UK needing sutures for perineal injury after spontaneous vaginal delivery, and many millions more worldwide. We compared the continuous technique of perineal repair with the interrupted method, and the more rapidly absorbed polyglactin 910 suture material with the standard polyglactin 910 material.
Methods: 1542 women who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery with a second-degree perineal tear or episiotomy were randomly allocated to either the continuous (n=771) or interrupted (771) suturing method, and to either the more rapidly absorbed polyglactin 910 suture material (772) or standard polyglactin 910 material (770). Primary outcomes were pain 10 days after delivery and superficial dyspareunia 3 months postpartum. Analysis was by intention to treat.
Findings: At day 10, three women had dropped out of the study. Significantly fewer women reported pain at 10 days with the continuous technique than with the interrupted method (204/770 [26.5%] vs 338/769 [44.0%], odds ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.38-0.58, p<0.0001). Occurrence of pain did not differ significantly between groups assigned the more rapidly absorbed material or standard material (256/769 [33.3%] vs 286/770 [37.1%], 0.84, 0.68-1.04, p=0.10). Women reported no difference in superficial dyspareunia at 3 months for the continuous vs the interrupted method (98/581 [16.9%] vs 102/593 [17.2%], 0.98, 0.72-1.33, p=0.88) or the more rapidly absorbed versus standard material (105/586 [17.9%] vs 95/588 [16.2%], 1.13, 0.84-1.54, p=0.42). Suture removal was done less with the more rapidly absorbed material than with standard suture material (22/769 [3%] vs 98/770 [13%], p<0.0001), and with the continuous versus interrupted method (24/770 [3%] vs 96/769 [12%], p<0.0001).
Interpretation: A simple and widely practicable continuous repair technique can prevent one woman in six from having pain at 10 days. Also, the more rapidly absorbed polyglactin 910 material obviates need for suture removal up to 3 months postpartum for one in ten women sutured.
Comment in
-
Perineal repair after spontaneous vaginal birth.Lancet. 2002 Nov 23;360(9346):1694. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11619-9. Lancet. 2002. PMID: 12457814 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A randomized comparison of suturing techniques for episiotomy and laceration repair after spontaneous vaginal birth.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006 Sep-Oct;13(5):457-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.06.006. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16962532 Clinical Trial.
-
Continuous versus interrupted episiotomy repair with monofilament or multifilament absorbed suture materials: a randomised controlled trial.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Aug;284(2):275-80. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1620-0. Epub 2010 Aug 1. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011. PMID: 20680312 Clinical Trial.
-
Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second-degree perineal tears: a randomised controlled trial.BJOG. 2009 Feb;116(3):436-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02056.x. BJOG. 2009. PMID: 19187377 Clinical Trial.
-
Incidence of perineal pain and dyspareunia following spontaneous vaginal birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jun;30(6):853-868. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03894-0. Epub 2019 Feb 15. Int Urogynecol J. 2019. PMID: 30770967
-
Can the suturing method make a difference in postpartum perineal pain?J Nurse Midwifery. 1990 Jan-Feb;35(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(90)90053-8. J Nurse Midwifery. 1990. PMID: 2406391 Review.
Cited by
-
The MOVE-trial: Monocryl® vs. Vicryl Rapide™ for skin repair in mediolateral episiotomies: a randomized controlled trial.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Oct 16;17(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1545-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. PMID: 29037181 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Patient-reported outcomes and outcome measures in childbirth perineal trauma research: a systematic review.Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul;32(7):1695-1706. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04820-z. Epub 2021 Jun 18. Int Urogynecol J. 2021. PMID: 34143238
-
Primary repair of advanced obstetric anal sphincter tears: should it be performed by the overlapping sphincteroplasty technique?Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Aug;19(8):1071-4. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0592-0. Epub 2008 Apr 3. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008. PMID: 18385917
-
Perineal care.BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 Apr 11;2011:1401. BMJ Clin Evid. 2011. PMID: 21481287 Free PMC article.
-
Postpartum perineal pain in a low episiotomy setting: association with severity of genital trauma, labor care, and birth variables.Birth. 2009 Dec;36(4):283-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00355.x. Birth. 2009. PMID: 20002420 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical