Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002;32(6):487-92.
doi: 10.1007/s005950200082.

Comparison between straight and J-pouch coloanal anastomoses in surgery for rectal cancer

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison between straight and J-pouch coloanal anastomoses in surgery for rectal cancer

Jen-Kou Lin et al. Surg Today. 2002.

Abstract

Purpose: This study was designed to compare the long-term results of straight and J-pouch coloanal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancers located in the critical position of 5-6cm from the anal verge.

Methods: The subjects of this study were 81 patients who underwent radical resection of rectal cancers located 5-6 cm from the anal verge, followed by straight or J-pouch coloanal anastomosis, performed in 41 and 40 patients, respectively. Careful clinical and manometric follow-up was conducted and the results were compared.

Results: There were no differences in the incidence of local recurrence, the disease-free survival rate, postoperative stool frequency, continence, sphincter pressures, or functional length between the two groups. Both groups had a high incidence of clustering or fragmented defecation; however, the J-pouch patients had better urgency control, a greater capacity before feeling the urge to defecation, superior rectal tolerance, and better compliance.

Conclusions: Both straight and J-pouch coloanal anastomoses are oncologically and functionally acceptable for the treatment of rectal cancer located 5-6cm from the anal verge, but the J pouch has slight superiority in urgency control, as a result of larger urge threshold and tolerable volume, and better compliance. The reason for the high incidence of clustering defecation in both groups needs to be investigated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources