The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors
- PMID: 12109766
- DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.4.748
The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors
Abstract
The authors report 6 self-paced word-by-word reading studies of how morphosyntactic agreement, focus status, and the structural constraints of binding theory apply and interact during the online interpretation of pronouns (e.g., him, her) and anaphors (e.g., himself, each other). Previous studies held that structural conditions on coreference work as interpretive filters that impose exceptionless limits on which antecedent candidates can be evaluated by subsequent, content-based processes. These experiments instead support an interactive-parallel-constraint model, in which multiple weighted constraints (including constraints on binding) simultaneously influence the net activation of a candidate during preselection stages of antecedent evaluation. Accordingly, structurally inaccessible candidates can interfere with antecedent selection if they are both prominent in focus structure and gender-number compatible with the pronoun or anaphor.
Similar articles
-
Differential effects of constraints in the processing of Russian cataphora.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Feb;63(2):371-400. doi: 10.1080/17470210902974120. Epub 2009 Jul 6. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010. PMID: 19585389
-
The Interaction of Contextual and Syntactic Information in the Processing of Turkish Anaphors.J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Dec;46(6):1397-1425. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9502-2. J Psycholinguist Res. 2017. PMID: 28567594
-
The Repeated Name Penalty, the Overt Pronoun Penalty, and Topic in Japanese.J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Feb;46(1):89-106. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9424-4. J Psycholinguist Res. 2017. PMID: 27016081
-
Pronoun resolution and discourse models.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Mar;18(2):266-83. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.2.266. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992. PMID: 1532820
-
Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics.Psychol Rev. 1990 Oct;97(4):488-522. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.4.488. Psychol Rev. 1990. PMID: 2247539 Review.
Cited by
-
The online application of binding condition B in native and non-native pronoun resolution.Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 25;5:147. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00147. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 24611060 Free PMC article.
-
Aligning grammatical theories and language processing models.J Psycholinguist Res. 2015 Feb;44(1):27-46. doi: 10.1007/s10936-014-9329-z. J Psycholinguist Res. 2015. PMID: 25408514 Review.
-
Editorial: Encoding and Navigating Linguistic Representations in Memory.Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 9;8:164. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00164. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28232812 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Retrieval interference in reflexive processing: experimental evidence from Mandarin, and computational modeling.Front Psychol. 2015 May 27;6:617. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00617. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26074829 Free PMC article.
-
Children's Pronoun Interpretation Problems Are Related to Theory of Mind and Inhibition, But Not Working Memory.Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 4;12:610401. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.610401. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34149504 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources