Strategies for genome-wide association studies: optimization of study designs by the stepwise focusing method
- PMID: 12111370
- DOI: 10.1007/s100380200050
Strategies for genome-wide association studies: optimization of study designs by the stepwise focusing method
Abstract
Recently, the use of genome-wide linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis to localize traits has attracted much attention because of the introduction of high-throughput genotyping systems. However, a limitation of such studies is often the total cost of genotyping in addition to sample size. Therefore, it is important to estimate optimal conditions for such a study given the total cost of genotyping. In the present study, we have introduced the "stepwise focusing method," in which candidate markers are selected in a stepwise fashion. In the first focusing step, samples from both case and control groups are genotyped at a certain number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (for example, 50000), and the markers that exhibit significant intergroup differences by a chi(2) test are selected. In the first step, the risk of type I error is set rather high (for example, 0.1), and, therefore, most of the selected markers are false positives. In the second step, the markers selected in the first step are tested by using samples obtained from a different set of case-control samples. We performed extensive simulation studies to estimate both the type I error and the power of the test by changing parameters such as genotype relative risk, disease allele frequency, and sample size. If the total number of genotypings was limited, the stepwise focusing method yielded optimal conditions and was more powerful than conventional methods.
Similar articles
-
Optimal robust two-stage designs for genome-wide association studies.Ann Hum Genet. 2009 Nov;73(Pt 6):638-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2009.00544.x. Ann Hum Genet. 2009. PMID: 19839987
-
Application of the stepwise focusing method to optimize the cost-effectiveness of genome-wide association studies with limited research budgets for genotyping and phenotyping.Ann Hum Genet. 2005 May;69(Pt 3):323-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2005.00157.x. Ann Hum Genet. 2005. PMID: 15845036
-
Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.Genet Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;30(8):703-17. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20181. Genet Epidemiol. 2006. PMID: 16986163
-
A critical evaluation of genomic control methods for genetic association studies.Genet Epidemiol. 2009 May;33(4):290-8. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20379. Genet Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 19051284 Review.
-
Genotyping platforms for mass-throughput genotyping with SNPs, including human genome-wide scans.Adv Genet. 2008;60:107-39. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2660(07)00405-1. Adv Genet. 2008. PMID: 18358318 Review.
Cited by
-
IL28B is associated with response to chronic hepatitis C interferon-alpha and ribavirin therapy.Nat Genet. 2009 Oct;41(10):1100-4. doi: 10.1038/ng.447. Epub 2009 Sep 13. Nat Genet. 2009. PMID: 19749758
-
Genome-wide association study of IgA nephropathy using 23 465 microsatellite markers in a Japanese population.J Hum Genet. 2015 Oct;60(10):573-80. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2015.88. Epub 2015 Jul 23. J Hum Genet. 2015. PMID: 26202575
-
A genome-wide association study identifies four susceptibility loci for keloid in the Japanese population.Nat Genet. 2010 Sep;42(9):768-71. doi: 10.1038/ng.645. Epub 2010 Aug 15. Nat Genet. 2010. PMID: 20711176
-
Identification of a significant association of a single nucleotide polymorphism in TNXB with systemic lupus erythematosus in a Japanese population.J Hum Genet. 2008;53(1):64-73. doi: 10.1007/s10038-007-0219-1. Epub 2007 Dec 6. J Hum Genet. 2008. PMID: 18058064
-
Detecting multiple associations in genome-wide studies.Hum Genomics. 2006 Mar;2(5):310-7. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-2-5-310. Hum Genomics. 2006. PMID: 16595075 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials